Public comments on CTI TC by Cory Casanave

From
Chet Ensign <>
Date
2015-04-22T13:42:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Public comments on CTI TC by Cory Casanave
With his permission, I forward the following comments we received from Cory Casanova, CEO, Model Driven Solutions.
/chet

----------

Forwarded message

----------
From:  Cory Casanave < 
>
Date:
Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 10:39 AM
To:  "  " < 
>
Cc:  " ' '" < 
>
Subject:  [Threat-Risk-Community] Comments on: Oasis Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI)

Technical Committee
The following are comments on the Oasis “Cyber Threat Intelligence  (CTI)

Technical Committee” draft charter from Cory Casanave of Model  Driven Solutions.
 Basis of interest: Model Driven Solutions is a submitter to the OMG Operational Threat & Risk Model RFP ( http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc.cgi?sysa/2014-6-17 ), which is referenced  in the draft CTI charter ( https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/201504/msg00006.html
). There is substantial overlap but some important differences in the  intent and substance  of the OMG standards effort and that as proposed by the Oasis CTI TC.  These comments are intended to help both organizations develop standards  that are in the best interests of the community of vendors, consumers  and other stakeholders.
 Of particular importance is making sure that Cyber threats and risks  are not made yet another “stovepipe” as we are faced with a world where  the boundaries between the physical and cyber world are porous and an  estimated 80% of threats  are blended between cyber and physical. Protecting our citizens,  property and critical infrastructure requires that we can “connect the  dots” between all hazards and all risks from threat actors, system  failures and natural disasters. This federation of information  must happen at “machine speed” to enable effective and responsive  analytics and information sharing to prevent and mitigate the impacts of  threats and risks.

The  STIX /TAXII/Cybox schema represent  important work within the cyber community for cyber threats and risks.  It is appropriate and necessary that the Cyber community have detailed  and specific exchange formats that are tuned to the needs  of cyber professionals. The same is true of other domains and  “verticals” such as law enforcement, critical infrastructure protection,  terrorism, biological, nuclear, and responses to natural disasters. Yet  these domains and the related organizations must  work closely together, often in difficult and unexpected situations.

To enable the focus needed for specific communities while preserving  cross-community collaboration, information federation and information  sharing the OMG threat & Risk model initiative is creating a  standard UML conceptual model that  federates the concepts from these multiple domains, based on the  existing work such as is found in the  STIX /TAXII/Cybox (as well as others). This UML model will then be mapped to the existing exchange formats, such as  STIX
(and others), to provide the basis  for semantic and syntactic information federation, analytics and  sharing. The OMG initiative is not defining any new data schema – we  have enough. The RFP has been issued and initial submissions will be  presented in May. The submission team is open (see  http://www.threatrisk.org ) and  STIX  community members have monitored our progress.

To relate the two efforts: The OMG effort is broader and shallower  where as the CTI effort is deeper and narrower. Both efforts intend on  providing UML models of the concepts (this fact is not explicit in the  charter but has been made  public on the  STIX  lists). The CTI effort is  also specifying exchange data structures such as XML schema, the OMG  effort is not defining any new schema but is mapping between schema  (standard, community or proprietary). However, schema could be generated  from  the UML models. In that the OMG effort has  STIX /TAXII/Cybox as a normative input and mapping the proper representation of the broad threat/risk and general concepts within  STIX /TAXII/Cybox are or will be defined in the OMG conceptual model. Approximately 75%  of this model has a direct correlation to  STIX /TAXII/Cybox such that the  STIX /TAXII/Cybox Cyber specific concepts could be considered an extension to the OMG conceptual model.

While  STIX /TAXII/Cybox are clearly focused on  Cyber, a reading of the charter where the term “Cyber” was removed  would correspond almost directly to the intent of the OMG threat/risk  effort. What this suggests is that much of what is  needed is in fact cross domain and not specific to Cyber. If not  specific to Cyber there is an almost complete overlap with the OMG  effort. It would be confusing, a waist of effort and a disservice to  both vendors and our defenders to come out with redundant  standards covering almost the same space. As stewards of standards it  is our responsibility to make sure such efforts are coordinated,  complementary and properly scoped.

It is our position that these efforts must be complementary by charter and that the following be included in that charter:
·           That the CTI effort will include a UML representation of Cyber concepts (Our understanding is that this is the current intent)
·           That there will be an explicit mapping of this  model to technology specific schema, such as XML schema (Our  understanding is that this is the current intent)
·           That the CTI UML representation be an extension of the OMG operational threat and risk model (This is an additional constraint)
·           That the OMG effort must include a foundation appropriate for extension to the CTI model (A current requirement of the RFP)

Cross membership and cross participation will ensure that these  requirements are both met and that both efforts meet their objectives.  Based on the substantial time we have spent evaluating both models such  collaboration and integration  is practical and would benefit both efforts.

Regards,
Cory Casanave
CEO, Model Driven Solutions
BoD, Object Management Group
Threat/Risk submitter

The above comments are from Cory Casanave representing Model Driven  Solutions and do not necessarily represent the position of the other  contributors and submitters to the OMG effort. Other stakeholders are  encouraged to also submit  comments to Oasis via   .

--
Robin Cover OASIS, Director of Information Services Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink
Email:  
Staff bio:  http://www.oasis-open.org/people/staff/robin-cover  Cover Pages:  http://xml.coverpages.org/  Newsletter:  http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html
Tel:  +1 972-296-1783
--
/chet    [§]

----------------

Chet Ensign Director of Standards Development and TC Administration  OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society  http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393

Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html    TC Administration information and support is available at  http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin
Follow OASIS on: LinkedIn:     http://linkd.in/OASISopen  Twitter:         http://twitter.com/OASISopen  Facebook:   http://facebook.com/oasis.open