RE: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

Hi Toby,

 

  Here's what you need:

 

The proper designation is:

Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 
1.0

 Public Review Draft xx Revision 
01

 

 

Once vote for CS passes, then it will 
designated:

Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 
1.0

Committee Specification 01

(date ballot closes)

 

And once OS vote passes, it will be: 

Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 
1.0

(1 month 2007)

 

All the details can be found here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html

 

Regards,

 

Mary

  

  
  From: Considine, Toby (Facilities Technology 
  Office) [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 
  18, 2006 10:51 AM
To: 
Subject: 
  FW: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

  

  
Well - what do we call them?

  
 
tc

  

  
  From: Brian Frank [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:45 AM
To: Paul 
  Ehrlich; Aaron Hansen
Cc: Considine, Toby (Facilities Technology 
  Office)
Subject: RE: Completion of OBIX Version 
  1.o

  

  

  
I have not posted the 
  my changes yet, because I’m not sure what to call it.  Am I posting the 
  final 1.0 document or something in-between?

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: Paul 
  Ehrlich [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:29 
  AM
To: Brian Frank; Aaron 
  Hansen
Cc: 
  'Toby Considine'
Subject: RE: 
  Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

  
 

  
OK.  As the TC 
  administrator Mary will need to start the vote.  We need to send her a 
  link to the document and a link to the comment disposition log (see 
  below).  Let me know where to find these and I will forward them to Mary 
  along with directions to start the vote.

  
 

  
Thanks;

  
 

  
Paul 
   

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
  Brian Frank [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 
  2006 9:20 AM
To: Paul 
  Ehrlich; Aaron 
  Hansen
Cc: 
  Toby Considine
Subject: RE: 
  Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

  
 

  
The changes are just 
  editorial:

  
 

  
---------------------------------------------------------------------

  
Change Log for 
  Working Draft 1.0 (27 Sep 06)

  
---------------------------------------------------------------------

  
 

  
- Public review 
  comments   

  
- Added sentence for 
  vendor specific facets in 4.16 

  
- Tightened up 
  server's responsibility on write failure in 
10.1.2

  
- Added sentence to 
  end of 7.2

  
- Fix typo in 9.1 
  example

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: Paul 
  Ehrlich [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:18 
  AM
To: Aaron Hansen; 
  Brian Frank
Cc: Toby Considine
Subject: FW: Completion of OBIX Version 
  1.o

  
 

  
Brian, 
  Aaron:

  
 

  
Below are the steps 
  we need to follow with OASIS.  I need the following from the two of 
  you:

  
 

  
1)       
  Are the 
  changes made to the document substantive or editorial? 
   

  
2)       
  If they 
  would be considered substantive then we will need a copy with the changes 
  marked and proceed into a 15 day review.

  
3)       
  If they 
  are just editorial then we can place a vote up to release this to a Committee 
  Specification status.

  
 

  
Paul

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
   [mailto:] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:46 
  AM
To: Paul Ehrlich; Dee 
  Schur; James Bryce Clark; James Bryce Clark
Subject: Re: Completion of OBIX Version 
  1.o

  
 

  
Hi Paul,

  Congratulations! 
  The next thing the TC needs to decide is whether or not the changes were 
  substantive (meaning that they would cause something built to the public 
  review draft to break or be invalid). If yes, then we do another 15-day public 
  review. The specific changes are marked, and only those changes are subject to 
  comments. Alternatively, if the changes are deemed to be editorial in nature, 
  then the committee can decide that it would like to vote for Committee 
  Specification status. CS ballots must be run by the TC Administrator so all I 
  need is a note from you indicating that the TC decided to move forward with a 
  CS vote and I can start the ballot. As part of that I'd also need the link to 
  the latest spec and a link to the comment disposition log (which should list 
  each comment received, a link to the message, and how it was resolved). 
  

Regards,

Mary

  

  
On 10/18/06, Paul Ehrlich <> 
  wrote: 

  

  

  
Mary:

  
 

  
I 
  need your advice.  We have completed the public review of the obix 
  version 1.o document.  The committee received comments from two 
  reviewers.  We worked with them and have incorporated the changes into 
  the document to their satisfaction.  Please advise on the next step in 
  getting this passed.  

  
 

  
Thanks;

  
 

  
Paul Ehrlich, 
  PE

  
President

  
(651) 
  204-0105

  

  
 

  
 

  

  

-- 
Mary P McRae
Manager 
  of TC Administration, OASIS

voip: 
  603.232.9090