Does this mean the current implementation as per the link is out
of conformance, or should be out of conformance….
Indelicate way to answer the question, I know…
"A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in
the wrong, which is but saying ... that he is wiser today than yesterday."
-- Jonathan Swift
Toby Considine
Chair, OASIS oBIX TC
Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC
Email: Toby.Considine@
unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073
http://www.oasis-open.org
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
From: Brian Frank
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:54 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [obix] Obix 1.1 and Interoperation and Conformance
In the case of units for history,
that is pretty straight forward - either the HistoryRecord or its prototype
should specify a unit facet (assuming the system in question has one
configured).
Regarding any areas of the spec where things are too fuzzy, I completely
agree. Lets make sure we try and get that stuff on the table.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Toby Considine <> wrote:
When we started the unfinished 1.1, one of the issues was increasing conformance
requirements. DO we think we have gotten all of those?
My mind went to this because of the following link I saw this morning
Display Measuring Unit in History OBIX
I am using OBIX to view a History The
return is something as below I am wondering how I could tell the unit is WHr
or KWHr Is there any configuration I have ...
This is another simple item to address
that we should…
tc
"Energy and persistence conquer all
things." -- Benjamin Franklin
Toby Considine
TC9, Inc
Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
OASIS Technical Advisory Board
Email:
Phone: (919)619-2104
http://www.oasis-open.org
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
