Comments on Common Encodings, PR01

(1)    Simple Editorial Comments

 

Line 16: Fix formatting of RFC647 format

 

Line 61-64: Update namespace to meet rules stated on oBIX 1.1, and allow for other namespaces as appropriate (i.e., for the 2015 version)

 

Line 61-64: Prefix rules invalidate *all* of the examples in 1.1.

 

78-81 See previous comment

 

Line 108 Change Full Fididelty to Full Fidelity

 

Line 462: “Eliminate sentence beginning “Even worse…”

 

Line 88: Add normative reference to UDP to the references.

 

 

(2)    XML Headers.

In Core 1.1, Section 8.4 (992-997) appears to be XML encoding rules. If they are meant to be general model rules, please re-write.  If they are XML-specific rules, suggest moving to XML section of Common Encodings.

 

 

(3)    Localization.

Localization rules in REST speciffcation In Core 1.1, Section 8.4 (992-997) appears to be XML encoding rules. If they are meant to be general model rules, please re-write.  If they are XML-specific rules, suggest moving to XML section of Common Encodings.

 

 

"Energy and persistence conquer all things." -- Benjamin Franklin 

Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

OASIS TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

SGIP Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email: 
Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com
blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com