RE: [obix] Schemas and UML

I think we have everything defined.  I am posting a new WD29 draft to the list tonight.

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Considine, Toby

Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:44 PM

To: 

Subject: RE: [obix] Schemas and UML

 

I can answer this, but I would prefer Craig to.

 

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

– George Bernard Shaw.

Toby Considine

TC9, Inc

OASIS TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

SGIP Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email: 


Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com

blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com 

 

From:
 [mailto:]
On Behalf Of William Cox

Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:31 PM

To: 

Subject: Re: [obix] Schemas and UML

 

What about the metadata/tags? I didn't understand your ":" comment earlier in this thread.

Is the metadata CDATA and structured (name-value pairs?)?

Thanks!

bill

--

William Cox 

Email: 
 

Web: 
http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 

+1 862 485 3696 mobile 

+1 908 277 3460 fax

On 7/14/14 8:48 AM, Toby Considine wrote:

We want new UML before we publish again.

 

The Schema seems to handle what we throw at it.

 

There *may* be a change passed on names/metadata depending upon how that paragraph gets re-written.

 

Do we have all the Lobby elements defined?

 

I ask because if and only if the Schema is stable is it time for another pass at the UML.

 

tc

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it."

- Brian W. Kernighan

Toby Considine

TC9, Inc

OASIS TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

SGIP Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email: 


Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com

blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com