Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [obix] 1.1 Schema version guidance sought

From
Considine, Toby <>
Date
2014-07-10T15:19:24+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [obix] 1.1 Schema version guidance sought
The only one’s I know of are potentially related to the Metadata tags. If those go entirely into internal content (Contains “:”, formal model, otherwise just
 text) then that is simplified…

 

tc

 

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

– George Bernard Shaw.

Toby Considine

TC9, Inc

OASIS TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

SGIP Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email:



Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com

blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com 

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of William Cox

Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:36 AM

To: Obix TC List

Subject: [obix] 1.1 Schema version guidance sought

 

The most recent schema, and apparently the one Toby's been validating against, is "obix-v1.1_WD21.xsd" or perhaps "obix 1.1 WD20.xsd". They differ only in the heading comments and XML Spy edit notes. 

WD21 carries an internal date of 19 December 2013

The "WD21" version says internally that it's WD24, CSD02/PRD02 rather than WD21 as indicated in the filename

The UML I've produced is based on the 2013-11-08 version, the WD24 version adds annotations and additional types

So I'm going to put reworking the UML on my work queue, starting with the WD24 version listed as WD21.

ARE THERE SCHEMA CHANGES PENDING RIGHT NOW?

For the future I would hope we could either

    (1) package the schema with the document working drafts, or 

    (2) keep a separate stream with changes only when there are changes to the schema, which would make it easier to track and decouple from the specification WDs.

Another approach would be that if WDxx were uploaded, the ZIP archive would contain the related schema, keeping the most recent changed version (WD24 in this case).  The references to the schema in the document header could probably stay the same, but it
 would be the full work product.

Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?

Thanks!

bill

-- 

William Cox 

Email: 

Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com

+1 862 485 3696 mobile 

+1 908 277 3460 fax
Next in thread → Next in month →