I will not be able to be at the meeting today, as I have a hard
conflict at 11:30 ET.
Agree with most of what Toby says below, except
The UML diagram does not yet reflect
tagspaces. I need to verify that the XSD is correct.
The UML diagram in my Sept 25 email to the list has tag spaces (in
class Obj - ts: string[0..1]) in all subclasses of Obj.
This is in Figure 4-1, line 567.
The lobby aspects of tag spaces aren't in the spec I think.
Thanks!
bill
--
William Cox
Email:
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
On 10/9/14 9:10 AM, Toby Considine
wrote:
I think WD34 looks pretty solid. We should
consider today a “white glove” test. We got it too recently to
vote it out today, and there are some minor issues.
The UML diagram does not yet reflect
tagspaces. I need to verify that the XSD is correct.
As I think about the conversation in the
last two weeks about stdlib.obix, I think that the white paper
hadnles that, Perhps stdlib.obix can even be an artifact
associated with the white paper. Perhaps we can vote it out as
a separate indicative artifact, treating it as if it were a
white paper. In any case, there is no need and some harm for
us to address it in the core spec.
Matthias: Is there a STA example that you
could contribute as a chapter for “OBIX by Example”
Markus: Is there an IoT example that you
could contribute?
I think we can lean on Craig/Ludo for the
building oriented ones.
tc
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing
the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the
code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not
smart enough to debug it."
-
Brian W. Kernighan
Toby Considine
TC9, Inc
OASIS TC Chair: oBIX &
WS-Calendar
OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy
Interoperation
SGIP
Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Email:
Phone: (919)619-2104
http://www.tcnine.com
blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com
