Re: [obix] Resolution procedure + schema issue

All --

    

    I've finished my Jira items; several are now assigned to Craig for
    minor editorial fixes.

    

    In my Jira review, I noticed the changes around contract (still in
    the WD38 schema at lines 41-43) as

    

    <xs:simpleType name="contract">

              <xs:list itemType="xs:anyURI"/>

          </xs:simpleType>
    

    The text related to "ContractList" (line 1020-1027 in WD38) is
    troublesome - but I could be convinced it's acceptable.

    

    Note that "contract" is in the schema and is not used.

    

    I'm thinking that since ContractList is really a conformed string
    that it would be best to have it as a simpleType with constraints,
    so

    <xs:documentation>Names the Contracts
      the Object implements. The value must conform to the rules for the
      contractList as described the
      specification.</xs:documentation>
    would more appropriately be in the description a new simpleType  so
    the constrained string is described in one place :

    <xs:simpleType name="contractList">

              <xs:list itemType="xs:stringI"/>

          </xs:simpleType>
    

    Would this break anything? It jars that "contract" would mean
    "contractList" by the normative comments...Removing an unused type
    definition is IMO non-substantive so we could remove it later.

    

    Thoughts?

    

    Thanks!

    

    bill

    

    

    
On 11/2/14 11:47 AM, Considine, Toby
      wrote:

    

    
      
      
      
      
      

        
Please Resolve tickets rather than closing
          them.

        
 

        
In the world of standards, closing first
          says “We blew off your comment”

        
 

        
Thanks

        
 

        
tc