← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (ODATA-299) Should Duration be renamed DayTimeDuration in anticipation that we may wish to add YearMonthDuration at a later point?

From
OASIS Issues Tracker <>
Date
2013-03-14T22:49:00+00:00
ID
158947110.4911363301329964.JavaMail.tomcat55@mw00
Thread
[OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (ODATA-299) Should Duration be renamed DayTimeDuration in anticipation that we may wish to add YearMonthDuration at a later point?
Should Duration be renamed DayTimeDuration in anticipation that we may wish to add YearMonthDuration at a later point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ODATA-299
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-299
             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: OData CSDL
    Affects Versions: V4.0_WD01
            Reporter: Evan Ireland


XML schema defines both dayTimeDuration and yearMonthDuration.

If we anticipate that we may wish to add CSDL support for YearMonthDuration later, then perhaps Duration should be renamed to DayTimeDuation now.

(Note for comparison how we renamed Point to GeographyPoint, since there is also GeometryPoint)


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →