Next in thread → Next in month →

[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (ODATA-576) Aggregation: Can we find a better way to represent nested expands?

From
OASIS Issues Tracker <>
Date
2014-01-09T09:38:51+00:00
ID
709707596.3011389260351392.JavaMail.tomcat@customer-jira
Thread
[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (ODATA-576) Aggregation: Can we find a better way to represent nested expands?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ralf Handl updated ODATA-576:
-----------------------------

    Resolution: 
https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/odata/trunk/spec/ABNF/odata-aggregation-abnf.txt?rev=541
https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/odata/trunk/spec/ABNF/odata-aggregation-testcases.xml?rev=541

> Aggregation: Can we find a better way to represent nested expands?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODATA-576
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-576
>             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OData Extension for Data Aggregation 
>    Affects Versions: V4.0_CSD01
>         Environment: [Proposed][Applied]
>            Reporter: Michael Pizzo
>             Fix For: V4.0_CSD02
>
>
> The current aggregation specification use the old path syntax for nested expands. This is inconsistent with the new way to represent expands in core. Can we figure out a syntax for nested expands in aggregation that is consistent with core?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Next in thread → Next in month →