← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: For consideration of specification authors (v2)

From
Ericson, George <>
Date
2017-04-01T14:24:56+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: For consideration of specification authors (v2)
The proposed additional flexibility doesn’t seem helpful with respect to promoting interoperability. 

 

In my experience, specifications are well served by following:
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, Principles and rules for the structure and drafting of ISO and IEC documents.

 

I recommend converting to the use of the terms: shall, shall not, should, should not, may, may not, can, cannot, and must as specified in clause 7 of the ISO/IEC
 Directives, Part 2.

 

Regards,

George

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Handl, Ralf

Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2017 6:55 AM

To: 

Subject: [odata] For consideration of specification authors

 

Specification authors should have a look at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6919  when reworking the V4.01 specifications. Some of these new normative keywords might come in handy.

 

Cheers!

Ralf

 

        In preparing for battle

        I have always found that plans are useless,

        but planning is indispensable.

        - Dwight D. Eisenhower
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →