← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: For consideration of specification authors (v2)
The proposed additional flexibility doesn’t seem helpful with respect to promoting interoperability. In my experience, specifications are well served by following: ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, Principles and rules for the structure and drafting of ISO and IEC documents. I recommend converting to the use of the terms: shall, shall not, should, should not, may, may not, can, cannot, and must as specified in clause 7 of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. Regards, George From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Handl, Ralf Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2017 6:55 AM To: Subject: [odata] For consideration of specification authors Specification authors should have a look at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6919 when reworking the V4.01 specifications. Some of these new normative keywords might come in handy. Cheers! Ralf In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable. - Dwight D. Eisenhower
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →