[OASIS Issue Tracker] (ODATA-595) We should define some sort of "profile" to specify which GML elements/attributes are valid with ATOM Geo-types

[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=66709#comment-66709 ] 

Michael Pizzo commented on ODATA-595:
-------------------------------------

Deferred due to inactivity on Atom format 2017-6-29.

> We should define some sort of "profile" to specify which GML elements/attributes are valid with ATOM Geo-types
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODATA-595
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-595
>             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ATOM Format
>    Affects Versions: V4.0_CS02
>            Reporter: Evan Ireland
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In regard to OData's use of GML for Geo-types with ATOM format, it is not specified if clients/servers can or should:
> (1) Use gml:pos (in particular for a set of points, an array of gml:pos as opposed to using a single gml:posList)?
> (2) Use gml:posList?
> (3) Use gml:coordinates (which is a deprecated GML element)?
> Also, there is no mention in OData of whether the GML srcDimension attribute should or must be indicated. When we are parsing a gml:posList, without knowing the dimension, it is next to impossible (without having a full database of SRID's to refer to) to separate the points, unless we assume only 2D systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)