Re: [office-accessibility] Fw: [office] Missing RelaxNG schema

Michael, 

We certainly can and I would prefer it. We just need the ODF 1.2 schema to make the modifications. So, if you can point me to the file we will be happy to do so.

Rich

Rich Schwerdtfeger

Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist

Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review  Board

blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer

Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>

Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <> 

Sent by: 

05/07/2008 04:05 AM

To

Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS

cc

Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, , OpenDocument Mailing List <>

Subject

Re: [office-accessibility] Fw: [office] Missing RelaxNG schema

Rich,

Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

> Michael, Robert,

> 

> We are creating a requirements document similar to we did for ODF 1.0. 

> The RelaxNG schema was removed. Do you require us to have marked up 

> RelaxNG schema like before.

For all changes to the specification we need the schema change as well 

before we can integrate the change into the specification. This is the 

case regardless whether the schema is embedded into the specification, 

or a separate document.

Which means that it is in any case helpful if the SC can provide the 

schema modifications together with any change request. If that's not 

possible, for instance because the requirement needs some discussion in 

or coordination with the main TC, then we may also start with the 

requirement itself, and can check how we get the schema when the 

solution for the requirement is known.

Best regards

Michael

> 

> Thanks,

> Rich

> 

> 

> Rich Schwerdtfeger

> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist

> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board

> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer

> ----- Forwarded by Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM on 05/06/2008 04:48 

> PM -----

> 

>                         *Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS*

> 

>                         05/05/2008 02:02 PM

> 

> 		 

> 

> To

> 		 

> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>

> 

> cc

> 		 

> , , 

> 

> 

> Subject

> 		 

> Re: [office] Missing RelaxNG schema

> 

> 		 

> 

> 

> Michael,

> 

> I guess this question is will the TC require us to provide schema markup 

> changes this go-around or will requirements suffice?

> 

> Rich

> 

> 

> Rich Schwerdtfeger

> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist

> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board

> blog: _http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer_

> Inactive hide details for Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 

> <>Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 

> <>

> 

>                                                 *Michael Brauer - Sun

>                                                 Germany - ham02 -

>                                                 Hamburg

>                                                 <>*

>                                                 Sent by:

>                                                 

> 

>                                                 05/05/2008 08:01 AM

> 

> 		 

> To

> 		 

> Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS

> cc

> 		 

> , 

> Subject

> 		 

> Re: [office] Missing RelaxNG schema

> 

> 		 

> 

> 

> Rich,

> 

> Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

>  > I developing a change request for the ODF accessibility SC on 1.2 using

>  > internal draft v7-01-01. I noticed all the Relax NG schema was missing

>  > which makes it a bit problematic to provide a full change request. Was

>  > the schema moved to a separate document?

> 

> The schema fragments have been removed from specification, at least

> temporarily. Whether they will be re-inserted or whether the schema will

> be published and/or maintained as a separate document has not been

> decided yet. Please see chapter 5 of

> _

> __http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/27948/CAP_OpenDocument_Editing_Principles_01.pdf_

> 

> for details.

> 

> The schema of draft 7 actually does not differ from that of draft 6, so

> you can use that for the moment.

> 

> Michael

> 

> 

>  >

>  > Rich

>  >

>  > Rich Schwerdtfeger

>  > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist

>  > Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board

>  > blog: _http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer_

>  >

> 

> 

> -- 

> Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering

> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org

> Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55

> D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          [email protected]_

> __http://sun.com/staroffice_         +49 40 23646 500_

> __http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS_

> 

> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,

>   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten

> Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028

> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer

> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

> 

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

> at:_

> __https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ 

> 

-- 

Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering

StarOffice/OpenOffice.org

Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55

D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          

http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500

http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,

		    D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten

Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028

Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering