RE: [office-formula] Comments from Dan Bricklin

From
Bastian, Waldo <>
Date
2006-02-28T22:58:14+00:00
ID
8AEB79DC01BE994D8DE3FD02FA5B475B02ECE1E6@orsmsx409
Thread
RE: [office-formula] Comments from Dan Bricklin
David Wheeler wrote:
>We COULD just define a large collection of operators and functions.  We
>could then predefine a set of "packages" that identify a set of
REQUIRED
>functions or groups of functions (directly or via other packages).
That
>way, you can say "My spreadsheet file requires the financial and
complex
>number packages", or whatever, and then you can see if YOUR
implementation
>has those packages.  If it does, you're set.

+1

Cheers,
Waldo