How do you see this working? We
each take a chunk, research it in parallel and then merge and discuss?
Or discuss as we go and then merge the census text?
I'm fine either way.
-Rob
"David A. Wheeler" <>
wrote on 07/18/2006 11:49:57 PM:
> We now need volunteers to start filling in the definitions of the
> remaining functions. Who's up for it?
>
> This means you'll need to
> examine the documentation of various applications and propose
> what should be required on all. Please let me know, even
> if you can only work on a few functions; many hands make light work.
>
> I'd like to assign by group, so that one person does a set of
> related functions.
> I'm trying to see if I can get some documentation released
> to us so we can copy it directly as a starting point (where appropriate).
> Obviously, we cannot copy any text without permission.
>
> That VERY MUCH includes creating test cases;
> every function should have AT LEAST one test case, and really
> should have several that test ranges. (Is 0 okay? Negative numbers?
> What happens with fractions? Empty strings?). The test cases
> are great for implementors, and they're also great for
> finding spec errors.
>
