On the namespace, are we suggesting
that table:formula becomes of:formula? I hope not. We're specifically
talking about a namespace prefix in the attribute value, i.e., the formula
string, right?
We probably also want to change 8.1.3
to say, "Every formula must begin with a namespace prefix..."
rather than the current "should".
-Rob
"David A. Wheeler" <>
wrote on 07/20/2006 05:20:46 PM:
> I'm about to write a summary of "current goings-on", both
> for Eike's benefit and for the larger OpenDocument committee at large.
>
> I believe we have more or less settled on the name of "OpenFormula"
> for this formula format; since OpenDocument can support many formats,
> it helps to have a specific name for this one. The proposed
namespace,
> which no one has objected to, is:
> urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:openformula:1.0
> The proposed conventional prefix is "of:" (yes, that
looks like formatting
> objects' fo:, but it's unlikely to be confused in practice).
>
> Any last-minute objections? Going, going....
>
> --- David A. Wheeler
