Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [office-formula] Functions that need to be identified as TBD

From
Eike Rathke <>
Date
2006-10-06T20:27:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office-formula] Functions that need to be identified as TBD
Hi,

On Friday, 2006-10-06 22:12:22 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:

> > * For CONVERT_ADD, CUMIPMT_ADD, CUMPRINC_ADD, DURATION_ADD,
> >    EFFECT_ADD, NOMINAL_ADD, GCD_ADD, ISEVEN_ADD, ISODD_ADD, LCM_ADD:
> >    define functions without the "_ADD" with Excel semantics, and have "_OOO"
> >    functions with the OOo semantics, e.g., "DURATION" vs. "DURATION_OOO".
> >    The "_OOO" naming convention is lousy; it's more
> >    of a placeholder so that we can differentiate the functions.  Suggestions?
> 
> I'd rather rename _ADD to _XL and keep the names without _ADD as they
> are.

Rethinking that, to be congruent with the other function names of the
AddIn package, it might actually be better to have them all without _ADD
and add an ORG.OPENOFFICE. prefix to the internal ones.

  Eike

-- 
Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements
of spreadsheets.  --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.
Next in thread → Next in month →