I'll pick this one but the same applies to most other comments of this
type:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 11:07 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> MIRR lacks parameters, at least as we define them for other functions.
>
In my copy, parameters are specified:
MIRR( Array Values ; Number Investment ; Number ReinvestRate )
Stating that "Values" are a bunch of values, "Investment" is the
investment rate and blablabla doesn't mean anything and doesn't define
anything either.
This function is defined by given a specific formula (with the little
problem that the lower case n and upper case N should be the same). I
would hope that all function definitions/descriptions would look like
the current 5.12.28 MIRR.
Andreas
> Correct to be consistent with the parameters solution generally.
>
> Note that in the cases of "missing" parameters, it may be that the
> "definitions" were recorded in the prose of "semantics." That may be
> generally true. In any case, we need to solve the parameter issue
> consistently.
>
> Hope everyone is having a great day!
>
> Patrick
>
--
Andreas J. Guelzow <>
