RE: [office-formula] BITAND

From
Andreas J Guelzow <>
Date
2009-12-10T19:17:27+00:00
ID
1260472616.3121.2.camel@localhost
Thread
RE: [office-formula] BITAND
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:04 -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> (In this regard, I
> emphatically disagree with the PS in the note from Andreas, and I believe
> the OASIS conformance guidelines are also in conflict with that PS.)

Dennis,
could you explain to me what you see as the difference between the
following two statements (in the context of the OpenFormula
specification):

1) To comply with this specification, an implementation *shall* support
parameters of at least 48 bits.

2) An implementation *shall* support parameters of at least 48 bits.

Andreas

-- 
Andreas J. Guelzow
Concordia University College of Alberta