So if we say "should" in a constraint, is that an example of "unless
otherwise noted"?
I hope not, since that would be rather subtle.
Stating the behavior once is fine, so long as we're consistent in doing
so. Randomly repeating ourselves suggests significance that is not there.
-Rob
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <> wrote on 01/13/2010
05:56:09 PM:
>
> Re: [office-formula] Formula Terminology
>
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:29 -0500, wrote:
> > 2) What happens if the constraints are violated?
> >
> > Compare to RATE():
> >
> > If Nper is 0 or less than 0, the result is an error.
> >
> > Do we really mean to say that constraint violations are errors in some
> > functions, but not in others?
>
> please see 5.2: "If a constraint is not met, the function/operator
> should return an Error unless otherwise noted." This issue comes up
> again and again. I guess that is the drawback of mentioning common
> properties and behaviour only once!
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas J. Guelzow, PhD, FTICA
> Mathematical & Computing Sciences
> Concordia University College of Alberta
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
