Data types

Greetings,

For the agenda tomorrow, can the data types in chapter 3 be on the agenda?

Question: For datatypes defined in XML Schema part 2, is the a reason we 
can't use that as a reference?

I realize that for REFERENCE, REFERENCELIST that we have to define those 
but that is a far smaller number than the ones we define now. (And 
thanks to David the world now has a workable definition of 
basis/yearfrac. Worth all the effort for that alone.)

I won't delete the material pending our discussion tomorrow.

Hope everyone is having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)