Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.

From
Dave Pawson <>
Date
2008-06-13T13:22:59+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
2008/6/13 Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
<>:
>>> I think we should focus on those features actually that are
>>> widely used rather than on test cases where we know that the features
>>> are not widely implemented.
>>
>> With what objective please?
>> A conformance check on the easily implemented tests (or weakly defined
>> features)?
>
> No, this is not what I meant. What I meant is that we should aim to measure,
> improve or write guidelines for those ODF features that are commonly used
> rather than caring about a few features that are seldom used.

Since we have no evidence as to 'what is commonly used' (and by whom)
I think that would be difficult.



>
>>> So far we have suggestion for tests, but we do not have suggestion how
>>> we can help implementors in their implementation work.
>>
>> I didn't read that in the charter Michael. Could you point it out please?
>
> Sorry, but to which charter you are referring. The purpose of this group is
> to discuss a charter, but I don't think this list has a charter itself. But
> actually implementation guidelines are included as item 4 in the
> announcement of this list:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oiic-formation-discuss/200806/msg00001.html
>
> So, its not out of scope.

Oh dear.

1.	To publish test suites of ODF for applications of ODF to check their
conformance with the Standard and to confirm their interoperability;
2.	To provide feedback, where necessary, to the ODF TC on ways in which the
standard could improve interoperability;
3.	To produce a set of implementation guidelines;
4.	To define interoperability with related standards by the creation of
profiles or technical reports;
5.	To coordinate, in conjunction with the ODF Adoption TC,  OASIS InterOp
demos related to ODF;

I interpreted item for in context.

I.e. guidelines on implementing tests. Not implementing ODF.

I wonder how many other misinterpretations there are
by myself and other people.

AFAIK you are the first person to mention ODF implementation
guidelines on this list.

regards





-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk