"Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"

oiic-formation-discuss · June 2008 · 11 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00281	"Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	jose lorenzo	2008-06-14 13:37
00284	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Dave Pawson	2008-06-14 20:28
00287	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	jose lorenzo	2008-06-14 22:31
00302	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Dave Pawson	2008-06-15 07:48
00336	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	[email protected]	2008-06-16 09:20
00363	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	jose lorenzo	2008-06-16 18:18
00364	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	jose lorenzo	2008-06-16 18:19
00366	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Sam Johnston	2008-06-16 18:25
00368	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Dave Pawson	2008-06-16 18:34
00371	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Dave Pawson	2008-06-16 18:59
00376	Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"	Sam Johnston	2008-06-16 19:38