2008/7/22 Shawn <>:
> There was lots of talk about acid tests, and other such testing. But in
> that I don't seem to recall any understanding that the TC would be
> responsible for building those tests - just defining the tests. Again, same
> point as above. But I'm just one voice.. :)
+1.
Robs suggestion early on, I still think it makes sense.
>> Off the Street Human Readable Documents. No killer legal terms and
>> the like sneaking in please.
>
> The discussion thus far for the FAQ deliverable is more aimed at the sorts
> of questions an implementor may be asking. But there is nothing saying we
> cannot put a plain language explanation of the TC's charter into the FAQs as
> well. The FAQ can easily serve as a tool to express ideas or concerns the
> public and/or implementors may want to hear about. In my opinion.. :)
Sounds good.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
