I have to agree with Josh here. Here is a document I found on pros and cons of CC.
https://legal123.com.au/creative-commons-licensces-pros-and-cons/
Thank You,
Nithya
Nithya A. Ruff
Head, Comcast Open Source Program Office
Mobile: 267-254-1083. Email:
From: <> on behalf of "Joshua R. Simmons" <>
Date: Friday, January 31, 2020 at 4:58 PM
To: Carol Geyer <>, "" <>
Cc: Jamie Clark <>
Subject: Re: Adding CC-0 to OASIS Open Projects
Oh, this is a tricky one. CC-0 is, like public domain, not considered open source. The authors withdrew CC-0 from the OSI license review process before it could be approved.
Some details on that here: https://opensource.org/node/878
I highly recommend the OP work with the auditing firm to find an OSI approved license that their lawyers/HR people find to be an acceptable alternative to using CC-0.
@joshsimmons (he/him) | bluesomewhere on Freenode
joshsimmons.com | +1 (707) 600-6098
ad astra per aspera 🚀
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, at 22:31, Carol Geyer wrote:
One of our current Open Projects needs to set up a repo under the CC-0 license, which is not one of the seven OASIS currently supports. (The OP wants to accept a major technical contribution
from a large auditing firm which has a conflict-of-interest policy that requires them to only contribute under CC-0.)
Before we recommend to the OASIS Board that CC-0 be added, we wanted to see if Advisory Council members have any thoughts--pro or con--on CC-0.
This is very time-sensitive, so please let us know as soon as possible if you have any views on this.
Many thanks,
Carol
--
Carol Geyer
Chief Development Officer
Open Source and Standards Communities
OASIS
