Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2] OpenC2: Call for Objections (rename repositories and maintainer)

From
Brule, Joseph M <>
Date
2017-08-29T12:43:16+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2] OpenC2: Call for Objections (rename repositories and maintainer)
All of the maintainers for the repositories sign the OASIS Contributor License Agreement (CLA).   The details of the CLA are documented at
https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/open-repositories/cla , with the clause that caught my eye being:  

“you also hereby grant to OASIS a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative
 works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute your Contributions and such derivative works.”

 

Each of the repositories also have an opensource license.  Yuuki uses the bsd opensource license and OrchID, Reactorrelay and reactormaster use the Apache 2.0
 opensource license.  

 

VR

 

Joe B

 

From: Jerome Athias [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 5:13 AM

To: Brule, Joseph M <>; 

Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2] OpenC2: Call for Objections (rename repositories and maintainer)

 

Hi, 

 

Maybe that could help no (re)specify the licence under which the artifacts in these repositories will be

 

2c 

 

 

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Mr. Joe Brule <> wrote:

All, We are calling for objections for two items: RENAME TWO GITHUB REPOSITORIES IDENTIFY TWO NEW MAINTAINERS Please respond with your objections NLT September 5, 2017 (eight days from now) RENAME TWO GITHUB REPOSITORIES: The ballot for
 the formation of the github repositories passed, however one of the voters made the comment "I object to having a company or organization name (nsa and g2) attached to the directory path of the projects." Are there any objections to renaming 'openc2-nsa-rd'
 to 'openc2-iacd'? Are there any objections to renaming 'openc2-g2bsd' to 'openc2-pub-sub-on-bsd'? IDENTIFY TWO NEW MAINTAINERS It is logical to have the author of a github repository as the maintainer, however two of the authors do not work for companies that
 belong to OASIS. According to OASIS (Robin Cover and Chet Ensign), this is not a problem if the person signs a CLA (to cover intellectual property concerns IAW OASIS rules) and if there are no objections from the TC. OASIS suggested that we get the repositories
 approved prior to calling for objections. Mr. Adam Bradbury is the author of OrchID, ReactorMaster and ReactorRelay. Are there any objections to naming him as maintainer (in lieu of Dave Kemp)? Mr. Joshua Brule is the author of Yuuki. Are there any objections
 to naming him as maintainer (in lieu of Dave Kemp)? Thank you Very Respectfully, Joe Brule
Next in thread → Next in month →