← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Action Item #0001 Submit an issue on 'Define Conformance Targets'

From
Bryan Aupperle <>
Date
2007-11-14T13:54:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Action Item #0001 Submit an issue on 'Define Conformance Targets'
+1

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.

STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Master Inventor

Research Triangle Park,  NC

+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)

Internet Address: 

"Michael Rowley"
<> 

11/14/2007 04:34 AM

To

<>, <>,
<>

cc

Subject

RE: [opencsa-liaison] Action Item #0001
Submit an issue on 'Define Conformance Targets'

Are we allowed to have emails about this before it has an issue number?

I'll risk it.

I like the first two items in the proposal, although I'm doubtful about

the third.  I suspect that in most cases, the error will be displayed
to

the user.  How a tool displays, what is essentially a compile-time

error, will vary greatly from tool to tool.  Some tools will underline

the offending SCDL with a red squiggly line.  I don't think this should

be disallowed?

I think standardizing on errors would primarily make sense if we were

standardizing on APIs for the various tools that would check for these

errors, but I don't think we are.

Michael
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →