Here's what the Bindings TC agreed:
The TC wishes the liaison sc to give
guidance on the granularity of namespaces across sca. The TC recommends
that more than one namespace be allowd across the SCA TCs. In addition,
TC suggests investigating different namespaces for each extensibility,
but in parallel, a broad SCA namespace, that duplicates the definitions
in the fine grained definitions, for all the technologies that go into
that.
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
Anish Karmarkar <>
25/03/2008 19:12
To
Michael Rowley <>
cc
Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
Subject
Re: [opencsa-liaison] Latest/This Version
URI for Schema/WSDL files
Michael,
Since we are the liaison reps from binding, were we (or was I) supposed
to do this?
-Anish
--
Michael Rowley wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't think a meeting is necessary for this one, but I believe that
> the binding TC was looking for input from the Liason committee regarding
> whether or not the bindings should be in the SCA namespace, a binding
> specific namespace, or both. I thought that someone from Bindings
was
> going to be formally asking the Liason committee to provide a
> recommendation on that.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
