← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Draft notes - 05 may 2008 LSC

From
Jeff Mischkinsky <>
Date
2008-05-05T16:02:52+00:00
ID
Thread
Draft notes - 05 may 2008 LSC
On May 02, 2008, at 5:11 PM,  wrote:
>
>
> Web-conf: http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/sca-lsc
>
> Agenda:
> 1.	Roll Call
Present: sanjay, jeff, bryan, ashok, mike r, anish
Notes: jeff

>
> 2.	Scribe Assignment

jeff
>
> 3.	Approval of minutes of 4/21/2008
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200804/ 
> msg00020.html

mike/bryan - approve unan

>
> 4.	Agenda Bashing
>
> 5.	Review AI
> See minutes of the last mtg

closed

>
> 6.	Issues

> a. Latest/This Version URI for Schema/WSDL files
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200804/ 
> msg00011.html
> Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa- 
> liaison/200804/msg00021.html

bryan/sanjay : Adopt the above resolution. UNAN

>
> b. Namespace for bindings and other extension points
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200804/ 
> msg00010.html
> Discussion thread: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa- 
> liaison/200805/msg00009.html

Mild preference for the "coarse granularity name space" approach for  
the 1.1 time frame, with understanding that fine-grained approach  
will be dealt with post 1.1. This is (partially driven) by the  
realization that the implicit plan is that there will be one  
synchronized 1.1 release for all the TCs. Note: the intermediate  
versions of the namespaces will be available for those who want to  
implement because everything is public.

in support - mike r, anish, bryan, sanjay, jeff, ashok

Assumption: As new things are added to the namespace the RDDL  
document should be updated. Each TC will be the owner of its section.

Although there is a clear consensus to adopt this approach, we  
understand that Simon probably has a strong contra-opinion. So rather  
than just adopt, we'd like to give Simon the chance to make his case  
"in person" at the next meeting.

>
> c. Use of Schematron in SCA Specifications
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200804/ 
> msg00006.html

BPEL TC is considering the use of schematron to express rules. What  
do we think about it?
There was discussion which needs to be continued - Possibly just use  
it as part of the test suites. Anish and Mike expressed a strong  
concern that we not remove the english conformance statements.


>
> 7.	Next Call Schedule

12 May 2008 8:00 AM PDT
     Sanjay will run the call. regrets for jeff

>
> 8.	AOB
>
none


--
Jeff Mischkinsky			          		
Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Web Services Standards	+1(650) 
506-1975
Consulting Member Technical Staff           			500 Oracle Parkway, M/ 
S 2OP9
Oracle								Redwood Shores, CA 94065
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →