Both dates work for me too!
All the best, Ashok
Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Sanjay,
>
> Both dates work for me.
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email:
>
>
> From: "Patil, Sanjay" <>
> To: <>
> Date: 29/06/2009 22:10
> Subject: [opencsa-liaison] Next meeting - July 2nd or July 9th?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On the last conf-call (on May 28th), we had decided to meet up on Jun
> 25th with Martin/Jeff coordinating that meeting. From the public
> archives of the list, it seems that the meeting on Jun 25th did not
> take place.
>
> Given that the PR has ended for some of the OpenCSA TCs, I think we
> should meet to review the overall status and also go over issues of
> common concern (e.g. what does common concern) and any specific issues
> submitted to the LSC [1].
>
> The question to the group is - when do we want to meet next? July 2nd
> or July 9th? Both the dates work for me.
>
> -- Sanjay
>
> [1]
> _http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200906/msg00000.html_
>
>
> _____________________________________________ *
> From: * Patil, Sanjay *
> Sent: * Thursday, May 28, 2009 17:10 PM *
> To: * *
> Subject: * Draft Minutes of May 28, 2009 conf-call
>
> OpenCSA LSC Conf-call
> May 28, 2009 - 10 AM Pacific
>
> 1. Roll Call
>
> Martin, Bryan, Sanjay, Jeff, Anish
> [Assembly, C-C++, BPEL, Bindings]
>
> 2. Scribe Assignment
>
> Sanjay
>
> 3. Agenda Bashing
>
> Approved
>
> 4. Approval of draft minutes of May 07, 2009
>
> _http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200905/msg00005.html_
>
>
> Approved
>
> 5. Action Items
>
> None
>
> 6. OpenCSA Project Management
>
> Status and schedule update
>
> Current Spec Work:
>
> Current Testing:
>
> *Assembly TC (Martin)*
> Martin - Spec out for PR to finish by end of Jun
> ... only one external comment so far
> ... plenty of internal comments mostly dealing with consistency
> ... test assertions, cases are being reviewed
> ... potential vote for CD on next Tuesday
> ... The OSOA consortium has provided the SCA Eventing extension
> document as input
> ... Anish described the submitted spec and no issues raised yet by any
> TC member *
> Bindings TC (Anish)*
> haven't gone to PR yet
> ... draft for JMS and JCA available
> ... binding.ws all priority 1 issues are resolved except for 1
> priority 2 issue
> ... plan is to have draft for review by the TC with resolutions of all
> prio 1 issues folded in with a proposal for prio 2 issue by next week
>
> ... TC may approve the draft on next week or following week *
> .*.. JMS and JCA specs may need couple of weeks to clean up the
> conformance sections
> ... the plan 'seems to' be to submit jms/jca/ws binding specs together
> for PR
> ... best case scenario - TC will approve all 3 specs on 11th and worst
> case on 18^th of Jun
> ... No testing work has started in the Bindings TC *
> Java TC*
> ... PR package has been submitted to TC admin long time ago
> ... Discussion has moved to secondary priority specs - ejb bindings,
> spring
> ... No testing work has started ye *
> .*.. there are two calls a week - on Mondays the TC discusses specs
> that are in PR
> ... and on Fri TC discusses spring c&i and ejb bindings
> ... jee related discussion is put on lower priority - issues are
> getting raised and recorded
> ... TC hasn't yet talked about a schedule for spring c&i and ejb
> bindings *
> BPEL TC (Anish)*
> already in PR
> ... We have a test assertion doc that covers the entire spec
> ... TC is discussing the assertion to debug the spec and fix many
> normative statements
> ... four more assertions to go through
> ... work on test cases has not started yet *
> C-C++ TC (Bryan)*
> both the specs are in PR
> ... Testing: test assertion docs for both the specs exist
> ... working through the test assertions to fix consistencies in the spec
> ... Test cases - a set of test artifacts for testing C=C++
> implementation of Assembly are now ready
> ... next step is to produce test artifacts for testing the C-C++ c&i
> implementation itself *
> Policy TC*
> PR doc is out
> ... draft for test assertion is under discussion
> ... not sure if test cases work has started
>
> 7. New Issues
>
> None
>
> 8. Issue Discussion
>
> Need to watch for what happens to Eventing and its implications on
> other specs
>
> Need to keep thinking about conformant implementations
>
> 9. Next conf-call
>
> Jun 25th - Martin to chair since both Jeff and sanjay can not make
> that call - Jeff to send out the agenda
>
> 10. AOB
>
> None
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
