Re: [opencsa-ms] Potential Sessions for Java One for SCA, SDO

From
[ark Mittle
Date
2007-11-06T17:06:41+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [opencsa-ms] Potential Sessions for Java One for SCA, SDO
Since I haven't submitted the proposal yet I think you may be making assumptions that are not true ;-)

Mark.

On 6 Nov 2007, at 17:00, Patil, Sanjay wrote:
  
 
 
Mark,
 
 
 
I would be concerned if the panel discussion turns into a SCA vs. JBI debate, primarily because the audience would also be interested IMO in understanding the value proposition, implementation status, etc, of SCA by itself. 
 
 
 
I think that someone (perhaps Peter!) should submit a proposal for an independent session/BOF on SCA and (not vs.) JBI.
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Sanjay

   
    From: Mark Little [mailto:]   
Sent: Tuesday, Nov 06, 2007 7:52 AM
To: Mike   Edwards
Cc: OpenCSA
Subject: Re: [opencsa-ms] Potential   Sessions for Java One for SCA, SDO

  

I'm working on the panel session abstract. Wait and see what that's   got because it may be relevant.  

  
Mark.
  

  

  
  
On 6 Nov 2007, at 15:52, Mike Edwards wrote:
  
Peter,     

Would you be willing to create a     session proposal on this topic (with potential help from others)?     

Yours,      Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co     Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146,     Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014        Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:       

          
Peter Walker <>           
Sent by: 
06/11/2007 15:27 
                      
                
To
"Jones, Steve G" <>               

                
cc
Mark Little <>,                 Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB, OpenCSA <>               

                
Subject
Re: [opencsa-ms] Potential                 Sessions for Java One for SCA, SDO

                      

Jones, Steve G wrote:
> Add in th non vocal me as well as on     both. But it needn't be limited to people on both, it would be good to see     people who aren't doing both explaining the different     reasons.
>
> Yes it is early, but it is one of the most common     questions out there. Will SCA and JBI end up competing or will we be grown     up and work together.
>   

I'm cooperating fully with     myself on this issue :-)

Peter.

        

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM     United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.     
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6     3AU 

  
  
----
  

  
Mark Little
  

  

  
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
  
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place,   107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, 
  
SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. 
  
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration   No. 3798903 
  
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters   (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
  

  

 
----

Mark Little



JBoss, a Division of Red Hat

Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, 

SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. 

Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 

Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)