← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Draft Minutes for today's OpenCSA Steering Committee - 2009-05-08
DRAFT AGENDA - OpenCSA Steering Committee (StC) Draft Agenda - 08 May 2009 9:00 AM PST Call-In Information: Participant passcode 370491 North America Toll free 1-888-240-4148 Toll/International +1-719-234-0214 London, UK, Local +44 (0) 20 7663 2217 UK toll free 0 800 051 6872 *6 mute/un-mute, *0 operator, *1 help NEW ACTION ITEMS: None 0. Agenda bashing and Roll Attending: Voting Members (X = Attended) X David Burke X Bob Freund X Anil Gurnani X Mike Kaiser (Secretary/Vice-Chair) Mark Little X Jeff Mischkinsky X Sanjay Patil Apologies: OASIS Staff: Robin Cover Jane Harnad Scott McGrath Mary McRae Dee Schur Identified Observers: None Notes: Mike Kaiser NO CHANGES TO AGENDA. - Public Review Comment by Microsoft. The gist of that comment... 1. Minutes Approval - 13 March 2009: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/opencsa-ms/download.php/31656/Open_CSA_SC_20090313_Draft.txt Motion to approve made and seconded. APPROVED without objection unanimously. 2. Open Action Item Review and Discussion AI20081212-001 - Coordinate an effort with Assembly TC to produce an SCA primer as the specs approach standardization (in review). STATUS: On Hold until we get closer to standardization. Keep on hold. AI20090313-001 Jeff to send the following recommendation to the TC's. Recommendation: Steering Committee Recommends inclusion of the completed test suite with the main package for the initial CS vote. STATUS: Still open. AI20090313-002 - Jeff to talk with mary to make the request to group SCA PR announcements. STATUS: COMPLETE - Should now be closed. Jeff send the following e-mail to Mary on March 13, 2009. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/opencsa-ms/email/archives/200903/msg00005.html Subsequent communications with Mary were done to inform her that Assembly and Policy specs should go first. Any others that are ready at the same time should also go, but Assembly nor Policy should be held up waiting for another TC. Will remove from future agendas. 3. Overall TC Milestones Status as discussed by LSC: Tentative dates for key milestones: On Feb 5, 2009 conf-call [A], the LSC discussed the following as the new anticipated schedule for the OpenCSA TCs: End Feb – Assembly and Policy TC to start 1st Public Review (60 day) Mid March – Other TCs to start 1st Public Review (60 day) End June – Finish all the work End July – Submit specs to OASIS for OS vote ASSEMBLY ONLY (now about a month behind schedule on testing work resulting in the following [B]) End Feb Test Assertion complete End March Test Case complete Mid April for Assembly TC only End June - 1st Public Review complete Recommendation that all other TC's set a similar schedule for for about one month later. [A] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200902/msg00003.html [B] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/opencsa-liaison/200901/msg00013.html The following represents the current state of each TC relative to Public Reviews * = PR 04/24 - 06/23 SCA-Assembly TC Specifications (V1.1) * SCA Assembly Model Specification SCA-Policy TC Specifications (V1.1) * SCA Policy Framework SCA-Bindings TC Specifications (V1.1) SCA Web Services Binding Specification SCA JMS Binding Specification SCA JCA Binding Specification SCA HTTP Binding Specification SCA-BPEL TC Specifications (V1.1) * SCA WS-BPEL Client and Implementation Specification SCA-C/C++ TC Specifications (V1.1) * SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification for C * SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification for C++ SCA-J TC Specifications (V1.1) SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification SCA Java Component Implementation Specification SCA EJB Session Bean Binding Specification SCA Spring Component Implementation Specification SCA JEE Integration Specification SDO TC Specifications (V3.0) Service Data Objects Specification Service Data Objects for Java What is the outlook for SCA-Binding, SCA-J and SDO TC specs? Where do each of these stand wrt Test Assertion and Test Case PR's? DISCUSSION: Hat's off to the team on this and a special hat's off to Mike Edward's efforts on this. SCA-Java TC has now approved approval docs and the package which includes the following is being completed for PR. SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification SCA Java Component Implementation Specification Other specs will follow later (as was the plan). SCA-Bindings TC is still about two weeks away from first review of first targeted specs. SDO is still pretty far away. We need to get a timeline for this. While it should plan to deliver sooner rather than later, it is not critical to the other TC's work timelines. 4. Compliant implementation plans We know that we need something about mid year. There are several companies working this but implementation timing is unknown. Open Source (Apache Tuscany, looks to be one source for at least some of the TC's. Fabric3 may be another). Each TC will have to make it's own decision on what compliant implementations they are going to use based on what's available in the timeframe of standardization and what their test plan looks like. The SC must eventually resolve the question of "how it will make approval decisions" and communicate this to the TC's. It is expected that the Testing Plans for each TC will incorporate implementation/testing aspects which encompass the broader "SCA" picture. We must address the following core questions: Are we all in agreement that the exit criteria in each charter applies to Member Submission for vote and not for Committee Specification approval? At this stage, what (if any) compliant applications are the likely candidates which the SC will likely generally accept? If there are no updates, then continue to hold on agenda for discussion at the next meeting. DISCUSSION: Continue to leave this on the agenda for future meetings. Tuscany and Fabric 3 still look to be the best compliancy implementation options, but until more of the Test Suite deliveries are done, this should remain on hold as far as the Steering Committee is concerned. 5. StC Elections Three of the 7 Steering Committee positions (currently held by Sanjay, Jeff and Anil) are targeted for balloting May 13th - May 27th. Nominations will be accepted until Tuesday May 12th. CURRENT STEERING COMMITTEE Steering Committee Next Election Member Affiliation for Seat ------------------- ----------- ----------- David Burke TIBCO May 2010 Bob Freund Hitachi May 2010 Anil Gurnani CSC May 2009 Mike Kaiser IBM May 2010 Vice-Chair/Secretary Mark Little Red Hat May 2010 Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle May 2009 Chair Sanjay Patil SAP May 2009 The Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary elected positions are in force August 1st 2008, through July 31, 2009. Seats elected in May are in effect beginning June 1st. Are there any further actions that the StC members need to take? DISCUSSION: Per business as usual, any bio's for accepted nominations will be placed in the 2009 Steering Committee Candidates documents folder. All nominees (even if self nominated) need to submit the acceptance letter per process (i.e. indicate that they have the time, submit background material for bio's etc..). At this point there are three nominations in process, but not all have submitted all the required pieces. 6. Any Other Business? DISCUSSION: Microsoft has submitted a Public Review for the SCA-Asscembly specification. This comment, though it needs to be responded to by the Assembly TC merits discussion at the Steering Committee since it seeks to change the rules of what it means to be SCA compliant. After much discussion, this boils down to which of the following two definitions of compliancy is appropriate to best serve the SCA community. A) SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the following: a) SCA Assembly, b) SCA Policy, c) SCA Binding, and d) at least one of the SCA Implementation Types (currently Java, BPEL, C or C++ ) B) SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the following: a) SCA Assembly, b) SCA Policy and c) SCA Binding There are pro's and con's to each argument. In the end the Steering Committee needs to leave this discussion on the agenda but allow the discussion to occur within the Assembly TC. Ultimately it is the Assembly TC which must respond formally. There is time to allow this discussion to happen in the open environment around the pro's and con's of each side of the argument. 7. Future SC Agenda Topics? DISCUSSION: None. 8. Next Meeting - The next regular teleconference is scheduled for June 12th, 2009 9:00am PST, 12:00pm EST, 5:00pm UK (OpenCSA Steering Committee calls are scheduled for the second Friday of each month.) DISCUSSION: It appears that there June 12th meeting may have conflicts with a number of Steering Committee members' schedules. Kaiser will work via e-mail to validate with members of the Steering Committee that the prior week, June 5th provides a better alternative 9. Adjourn Adjourned.
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →