← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →

Proposed - OpenCSA Steering Committee (StC) Proposed Agenda - 09 October2009

From: Mike Kaiser <>
Date: 2009-10-09T13:33:55+00:00
ID
Thread: Proposed - OpenCSA Steering Committee (StC) Proposed Agenda - 09 October2009

PROPOSED AGENDA - OpenCSA Steering Committee
(StC) Proposed Agenda - 9 October 2009 9:00 AM PST

Call-In Information: (PLEASE NOTE
THE NEW PASSCODE BELOW)

Participant
passcode: 677139 <--- NEW PASSCODE

North
America Toll free 1-888-240-4148

Toll/International
+1-719-234-0214

London,
UK, Local +44 (0) 20 7663 2217

UK
toll free 0 800 051 6872

*6
mute/un-mute, *0 operator, *1 help

Our thanks to David Burke and TIBCO
for hosting the teleconference number.

0. Agenda bashing and Roll

1. Minutes Approval

-
11 September 2009:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/opencsa-ms/download.php/34176/Open_CSA_SC_20090911_Draft.txt

2. Open Action Item Review and Discussion

AI20081212-001
- Coordinate an effort with Assembly TC to produce an

SCA primer as the specs approach standardization
(in review).

STATUS: On Hold until we get closer to standardization.

Keep on
hold.

Agenda for next item.

AI20090814-001
- Mike to get the status of SDO for the next

Steering Committee call.

STATUS: Not done.

AI20090911-001-

-
Sanjay to provide an initial skeleton draft for a statement

describing what a non-SCA OASIS solution would need to achieve.

-
Bob to insert IPR terms and review

-
Mike to assist in proposal review and post for next meeting's

discussion/review.

STATUS: Not done.

3. Overall TC Milestones Status as discussed
by LSC:

The
following represents the current state of each TC relative

to
Public Reviews

*
= PR 04/24 - 06/23

&
= PR 06/08 - 08/07

?
= PR 08/08 - 10/07

-
= Schedule not available at this time. (lower priority)

SCA-Assembly
TC Specifications (V1.1)

* SCA Assembly Model Specification

SCA-Policy
TC Specifications (V1.1)

* SCA Policy Framework

SCA-BPEL
TC Specifications (V1.1)

* SCA WS-BPEL Client and Implementation Specification

SCA-C/C++
TC Specifications (V1.1)

* SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification
for C

* SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification
for C++

SCA-J
TC Specifications (V1.1)

& SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs
Specification

& SCA Java Component Implementation Specification

- SCA EJB Session Bean Binding Specification

- SCA Spring Component Implementation Specification

- SCA JEE Integration Specification

SCA-Bindings
TC Specifications (V1.1)

? SCA Web Services Binding Specification

? SCA JMS Binding Specification

? SCA JCA Binding Specification

- SCA HTTP Binding Specification

SDO
TC Specifications (V3.0)

- Service Data Objects Specification

- Service Data Objects for Java

Where
are we on the Test Suite progress for each?

(i.e. Test Cases, Test Assertions) For each

- When is TC final review scheduled?

- When is vote for PR scheduled?

- When is Submission to TC Admin for
PR scheduled?

- When is PR targeted?

Public Review
dates for Test Suites (Assertions/Test Cases)

08/18 - 10/17 SCA-Assembly

??/?? - ??/?? SCA-Policy

??/?? - ??/?? SCA-Bindings

??/?? - ??/?? SCA-BPEL

??/?? - ??/?? SCA-C/C++

??/?? - ??/?? SCA-J

??/?? - ??/?? SDO

Where do
we stand on CD status with the specs with "-" in the

list
above?

-Spring
Binding CD was expected to have completed by end

of August/first week of Sept. Status?

4. Compliant implementation plans

Discussion
on hold until a TC votes a CS.

5. Response to Microsoft and Siemens
SCA-Assembly Public Review comments.

Microsoft
and Siemens (and other internal SCA members) have

raised
the question around which of the two following paths

should
be taken for claiming SCA Compliance (i.e. A or B).

A)
SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the

following:

a) SCA Assembly,

b) SCA Policy,

c) SCA Binding, and

d) at least one of the SCA Implementation
Types

(currently Java, BPEL, C or
C++ )

B)
SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the

following:

a) SCA Assembly,

b) SCA Policy and

c) SCA Binding

What
is the Steering Committee position?

Additionally,
Siemens has challenged the notion that c) should

also
not be included in the compliancy requirement.

What
is the Steering Committee position?

At
the last meeting we discussed the possibility of trying to

use
the OASIS feedback channel to have parties submit their

test
suites, conformance claims, interface descriptions, etc...

(i.e. test
materials) to the OASIS server. StC and LSC would

review these
submissions and make a call before posting approval

and making
submitted data available via a public facing OASIS

web page.
(details TBD).

This would
solve some of the fundamental characteristics which

desired,
including:

-
must have some type of document that describes, and

-
must have a reasonable test suite, and

-
must have RF IP aspects equivalent/similar to the OASIS RF IPR,

and

-
must be freely available (downloadable/accessible) to the public

7. Discussion around new Steering Committee
Secretary

8. Any Other Business?

9. Future SC Agenda Topics?

None

10. Next Meeting

-
The next regular teleconference is scheduled for

FRIDAY November 13th, 2009 9:00am PST, 12:00pm EST, 5:00pm UK

(OpenCSA
Steering Committee calls are scheduled for the second Friday

of each month.)

11. Adjourn

View original preserved HTML → View on OASIS Connected Community →

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →