Re: This week's meeting - minutes & membership (3 lost voting rights, 0 gained) - update (1 member left)

Update to membership changes:

At the end of this meeting: 

Members who lost voting rights: 

Bill Chown (Mentor Graphics) group role has been
changed to Member 

Lin Ju (IBM) role has been changed to Member 

Steve Speicher (IBM) group role has been changed
to Member 

Members who gained voting rights: 

None 

Leave of Absence 

None 

Membership changes 

Kyle Perkuhn (National Instruments) has left the
TC 

TC summary 

The TC has 4 voting members, 6 non-voting members, and
2 observers. 

The latest TC roster is at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/oslc-automation/members/roster.php
Next meeting: 

Members who will lose voting rights if they do
not attend: 

Florian Georg (IBM) 

Members who will gain voting rights if they attend:

Lonnie VanZandt
(Sodius SAS) 

Uri Shani (IBM) 

Martin Pain

Software Developer - Green Hat

Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel

OASIS Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation technical
committee chair

E-mail:


Find me on:  and
within IBM on:  

IBM United Kingdom Limited

Registered in England and Wales with number 741598

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU

From:      
 Martin P Pain/UK/IBM

To:      
 ,

Date:      
 23/04/2014 10:19

Subject:    
   This week's
meeting - minutes & membership (3 lost voting rights, 0 gained)

The minutes and membership changes for
this week's meeting are here: https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-automation/Meetings/Telecon2014.04.22

We didn't reach quorum, but the minutes
are recorded anyway in case anyone wants to catch up with what was discussed.

Membership changes

At the end of this meeting: 

Members who lost voting rights: 

Bill Chown (Mentor Graphics) group role has been
changed to Member 

Lin Ju (IBM) role has been changed to Member 

Steve Speicher (IBM) group role has been changed
to Member 

Members who gained voting rights: 

None 

Leave of Absence 

None 

Membership changes 

None 

TC summary 

The TC has 4 voting members, 6 non-voting members, and
2 observers. 

The latest TC roster is at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/oslc-automation/members/roster.php
Next meeting: 

Members who will lose voting rights if they do
not attend: 

Florian Georg (IBM) 

Members who will gain voting rights if they attend:

Lonnie VanZandt
(Sodius SAS) 

Uri Shani (IBM) 

Minutes

Chair

Martin Pain 

Scribe

John Arwe 

Attendees

John Arwe (IBM), Martin Pain (IBM), Uri Shani (IBM), Umberto
Caselli (IBM). Quorum not achieved. 

Regrets

Florian Georg and Steve Speicher 

Original
Chat transcript from room: oslc-automation 

[16:13] John Arwe (IBM): scribe: John Arwe 

[16:13] John Arwe (IBM): ... under the assumption that
either (a) we will get to quorum eventually or (b) others will use them
to catch up. 

[16:14] John Arwe (IBM): Topic: Scenario submitted via
email 

[16:14] John Arwe (IBM): https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/oslc-automation/email/archives/201404/msg00008.html

[16:17] John Arwe (IBM): some recap of concepts coverable
via oslc automation 2.0, which is an accepted contribution. 

[16:17] Martin Pain (IBM): http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/Automation-Scenarios/

[16:18] Martin Pain (IBM): http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/

[16:19] John Arwe (IBM): scenarios link above is from oslc
automation 2.0; second link is working group's home page, which also has
information about scope and has companion documents like best practices
and primer that might help those new to automation 2.0 

[16:20] John Arwe (IBM): Uri notes that scenarios are software-build
oriented, whereas same basic process applies to other things like simulation,
optimization, .... 

[16:21] John Arwe (IBM): reading the oasis wiki scenario,
C3 variant B refers to parallel builds... first I'm seeing that requirement
emerging, on a top to bottom read. seems like a good one (non-obvious)
if we are capturing reqts somewhere. 

[16:22] John Arwe (IBM): back to Martin's scenario: automation
2.0 does not cover hand-offs across providers, e.g. (in this case) how
to "map" the build artifacts (outputs) from one step to input
parameters on a later step. discussion with Uri about SOA. 

[16:23] John Arwe (IBM): Uri: SOA has been around a long
time, has solutions for that problem. 

[16:28] John Arwe (IBM): Uri: is it a goal of this spec
that the inter-service bindings (mapping of parameters) could be automatically
generated? Martin: not one has asked for that yet. 

[16:31] John Arwe (IBM): ... Martin's scenario leaves that
to the user to do. 

[16:35] John Arwe (IBM): Uri: SOA may not be an issue here,
you're trying to be more concrete here. 

[16:36] John Arwe (IBM): Uri: should address lifecycle
aspects beyond testing and software 

[16:48] John Arwe (IBM): adjourned 

Martin Pain

Software Developer - Green Hat

Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel

OASIS Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation technical
committee chair

E-mail:


Find me on:  and
within IBM on:  

IBM United Kingdom Limited

Registered in England and Wales with number 741598

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU