[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OSLCCCM-14) How should previousBaseline behave when an intermediate baseline is deleted?

From
OASIS Issues Tracker <>
Date
2016-06-01T20:33:51+00:00
ID
Thread
[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OSLCCCM-14) How should previousBaseline behave when an intermediate baseline is deleted?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCCM-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62570#comment-62570 ] 

Nick Crossley commented on OSLCCCM-14:
--------------------------------------

Proposal for non-normative text added, as discussed in meeting on 2016/05/19.

> How should previousBaseline behave when an intermediate baseline is deleted?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OSLCCCM-14
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCCM-14
>             Project: OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Change and Configuration Management (OSLC CCM) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configuration Management
>            Reporter: Nick Crossley
>            Assignee: Nick Crossley
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When a baseline is deleted, should existing baselines derived from the deleted one have their oslc_config:previousBaseline property updated to point to the previousBaseline of the one being deleted, to maintain the provenance chain? Or would this break things like digital signatures?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)