RE: [oslc-ccm] Remaining open CM issues

Hi Jim, I have a few comments on issue 27 but basically it’s almost done so I’d put that at the top of the list.

I added a comment to issue 32 – yes, it could be considered a subset of 28 but I would like to include non-normative guidance about ordering relationships because 32 does required
 ordering of the relationships. Yes I know that you will recommend that such guidance should live in the core spec, and you don’t even want it there because it is a standard RDF extension, but I still need to say it.

 

So next priority should be 28, and finally 29. I believe it was at last meeting that David said 29 would be useful for something one of your IBM teams is doing. 12 seems to
 be done.

 

Thanks, Martin

 

 

Dr. Martin Sarabura

Technical Fellow, Office of the CTO

+1 519.502.4819



 

 

 

 

 

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jim Amsden

Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 2:26 PM

To: OSLC CCM TC () <>

Subject: [oslc-ccm] Remaining open CM issues

 

These are the open CM issues. All will require some discussion. Except for OSLCCCM-12, these were created by Martin, so Martin - how would you like
 to prioritize these issues?

OSLCCCM-27 New type ChangeAuthorization needed for CM spec

OSLCCCM-28 Need a decomposition reference

OSLCCCM-29 References to before and after states of affected resources

OSLCCCM-32 Ability to associate a set of change requests to a parent change request

OSLCCCM-12 Initial Change Management Specification Updates

Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member

OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data

919-525-6575