+1 for compacted form
From:
Steve K Speicher <>
To:
"OASIS OSLC Core
TC Discussion List" <>
Date:
25/11/2014 18:55
Subject:
[oslc-core]
Simple titles/names for our specs
Sent by:
<>
I just wanted to put this out there
as an approach to naming specifications, namely about including the definition
of OSLC in the name. I think this is overly verbose, confusing and
really doesn't add anything.
Take for example the Link guidance work: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/oslc-core/supporting-docs/link-guidance.html
Title: "Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Link Guidance 3.0"
(I'm not picking on Ian and Jim, just using
as an example)
Then take attachments work: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/oslc-core/specs/attachments-v3.html
Title: "OSLC Attachments 3.0"
Especially looking at them in context, it is hard to understand what linking
guidance is about from the title loaded. If someone doesn't know
what OSLC is, lands on one of these docs for the first time ... there will
be a chance in the intro or references to get the full definition of it.
Any disagreement with using the "compacted" form?
We don't spell out OASIS everywhere, just saying.
Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
