I could go along with that. Nick?
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
From:
Jad El-Khoury <>
To:
"OSLC Core TC
()" <>
Date:
02/24/2016 03:33 PM
Subject:
RE: [oslc-core]
oslc:range property values.
Sent by:
<>
Hi,
>in the shape file: "For
object properties, an allowed object resource type."
>Change to: "For object properties, specifies what the object resource
type is expected to be, but that is not necessarily the case."
I believe “but that is not necessarily
the case” raises more confusion than it helps. It almost gives the impression
that the value given would be almost unreliable.
I think the first part alone (“For
object properties, specifies what the object resource type is expected
to be”) is weak and clear enough.
regards
______________________________
Jad El-khoury, PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering
and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44
Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile:
+46(0)70 773 93 45
,
www.kth.se
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jim Amsden
Sent: 22 February 2016 19:33
To: OSLC Core TC ()
Subject: Re: [oslc-core] oslc:range property values.
It was just a note and should have been:
allowedValue - unspecified oslc:valueType
defaultvalue - unspecified oslc:valueType
These
two properties don't specify a valueType since they could be literal or
object values. So they should not have any oslc:range specified either.
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
From: Nick
Crossley/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
To: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: "OSLC
Core TC ()"
<>
Date: 02/22/2016
12:06 PM
Subject: Re:
[oslc-core] oslc:range property values.
Sent by: <>
I'm unsure what you mean by these two:
allowedValue - unspecified oslc:valueType
defaultvalue - specified oslc:valueType
I'm fine with everything else.
Nick.
Jim
Amsden---02/22/2016 08:17:04 AM---At the last Core TC meeting I was assigned
the following actions: Weaken the description of range so
From: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: "OSLC Core TC ()"
<>
Date: 02/22/2016 08:17 AM
Subject: [oslc-core] oslc:range
property values.
Sent by: <>
At the last Core TC meeting I was assigned the following actions:
Weaken the description of
range so that it is recommended types, not required types
Create an inventory of core
object properties that could have a type and propose one
Send out an email with this
information and get feedback whether this should be included in the spec
or not.
Below are the results. Take a look at the proposed oslc:range values and
see if these are 1) useful and 2) not over-constraining server implementations
or domain usages.
We should schedule a vote on this, and if adopted I will add the oslc:range
values to the property shapes.
1. oslc:range property description:
In the specification body: The object resource SHOULD be any of the specified
oslc:range types, but no inferencing is intended if the actual target resource
is or is not one of these types. This is very different semantics than
rdfs:range which does have inferencing implications.
This may already be weak enough.
in the shape file: "For object properties, an allowed object resource
type."
Change to: "For object properties, specifies what the object resource
type is expected to be, but that is not necessarily the case."
2. Proposed oslc:range values for object properties:
Common Properties:
contributor - foaf:Agent
creator - foaf:Agent
relation
type - rdf:type
member
serviceProvider - ServiceProvider
instanceShape - ResourceShape
discussedBy - oslc:Discussion
modifiedBy - foaf:Agent
Comment
inReplyTo - oslc:Comment
Compact
icon
largePreview - oslc:Preview
smallPreview - oslc:Preview
CreationFactory
creation - ldp:Container
resourceShape - oslc:ResourceShape
resourceType - rdf:type
usage
Dialog
resourceShape - oslc:ResourceShape
resourceType - rdf:type
usage
Discussion
comment - oslc:Comment
discussionAbout
Error
extendedError - oslc:ExtendedError
ExtendedError
moreInfo
OAuthConfiguration
oauthRequestTokenURI
authorizationURI
oauthAccessTokenURI
PrefixDefinition
prefixBase
Preview
document
Publisher
icon
QueryCapability
queryBase
resourceShape - oslc:ResourceShape
resourceType - rdf:type
usage
ResourceShape
describes
property - oslc:Property
allowedValues - oslc:AllowedValues
allowedValue - unspecified oslc:valueType
defaultvalue - specified oslc:valueType
occurs - oslc:Cardinality
propertyDefinition - rdf:Property
range - rdf:type
representation - oslc:Representation
valueShape - oslc:ResourceShape
valueType - oslc:ResourceValueType
Service
domain
creationFactory - oslc:CreationFactory
queryCapability - oslc:QueryCapability
selectionDialog - oslc:Dialog
creationDialog - oslc:Dialog
usage
ServiceProvider
publisher - oslc:Publisher
service - oslc:Service
details
prefixDefinition - oslc:PrefixDefinition
oauthConfiguration - oslc:OAuthConfiguration
ServiceProviderCatalog
domain
publisher - oslc:Publisher
serviceProvider - oslc:ServiceProvider
serviceProviderCatalog - oslc:ServiceProviderCatalog
oauthConfiguration - oslc:OAuthConfiguration
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
