← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Adding conformance class markers
Here's my notes on how to update the OSLC core documents to mark conformance clauses and generate the Conformance section. We agreed to day that: - Nick will cover Configuration Management and TRS documents - David will cover OSLC Query - Martin will do Discovery. - Jim will do the rests (the TODO items that are unchecked below or Dialogs, Core, Resource Preview, Resource Shapes) When these are done, we can publish another committee specification and determine if it needs another public review. Apply changes to all core documents to capture conformance clauses using the new ReSpec feature. â Add the following respecConfig parameter for the specification, e.g.,: conformanceLabelPrefix: "AT", â Change sections representing conformance clauses to <p id=âââ class='conformance' â Add this section right before the first appendix (the content will be generated): <section id="conformance"></section> â Make sure thereâs some conformance clause for the vocabulary and constraints. Something like the following needs to be added if its not already there: <p class='conformance'>An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the vocabulary defined in this section.</p> <p class='conformance'>An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the Constraints defined in this section.</p> â Attachments: has an Implementation Conformance section and each requirement or possible conformance clause is marked in normalText headers. â Add the following respecConfig parameter: conformanceLabelPrefix: "AT", â Change sections such as: <section id="attachment_update_descriptor"> <h2></h2> When servers update an attachment, they MUST also update any affected <code>oslc:AttachmentDescriptor</code> properties of the associated attachment descriptor. </section> to: <p id="attachment_update_descriptor" class="conformance"> When servers update an attachment, they MUST also update any affected <code>oslc:AttachmentDescriptor</code> properties of the associated attachment descriptor. </p> â Make sure thereâs some conformance clause for the vocabulary and constraints. Something like the following needs to be added if its not already there: <p class='conformance'>An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the vocabulary defined in this section.</p> <p class='conformance'>An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the Constratints defined in this section.</p> â Add this section right before the first appendix (the content will be generated): <section id="conformance"></section> â Dialogs: has an Implementation Conformance section and each requirement is marked in normalText headers. â Discovery: marks the requirements in normalText headers, but doesnât organize them in a specific Implementation Conformance section. Martin will do these â Core: marks the requirements in normalText headers, but doesnât organize them in a specific Implementation Conformance section. I already started this â Resource Preview: has an Implementation Conformance section and each requirement or possible conformance clause is marked in normalText headers. â Resource Shapes: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. â Core Vocabulary: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. â Query: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. David will do these â TRS: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. Nick will do these â Config Management: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. Nick will do these â Versioned Resources: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. Nick will do these â Configuration Specification: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. Nick will do these â RDF Vocabulary: has no conformance section and doesnât mark any conformance clauses or rules. Only has normative sections and MUST, SHOULD, MAY requirements. Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data 919-525-6575
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread