Re: [oslc-domains] Combined OSLC Domains and Core TC meeting minutes 20190509

List of attendees:
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH), David Honey (Persistent/IBM), Jad El-khoury (KTH), Jim Amsden (IBM), Nick Crossley (IBM).

 

--

âAndrew.

 

FrÃn:
<> pà uppdrag av Jim Amsden <>

Datum: torsdag, 9 maj 2019, W19 18:01

Till: "" <>, OSLC Core TC <>

Ãmne: [oslc-domains] Combined OSLC Domains and Core TC meeting minutes 20190509

 

Jim Amsden (IBM):Previous minutes:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-domains/201905/msg00001.html

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Andrew is the scribe

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Minutes approved

Jim Amsden (IBM): Open Project

* Announcement May 8 but points to the old OSLC organization...

* Reorganization of content

* Migration of content

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Andrew asked Chet to create a new GH organisation.

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH):
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-core/issues/27

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): .

 Templates

    OSLC-Core-publishing-instructions

 open-services-vocabs

 pub

 reviews

 specs

    am

    asset

    auto

    cm

    config

    contexts

    core

    ems

    images

    perfmon

    qm

    query

    recon

    rm

    schema

    trs

 styles

 supporting-docs

     sketch-images

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): specs will be merged with the ones from domains

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we need styles + relative refs will need to be updated

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): supporting docs are specs that are not going to be published

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): pub can go away

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): reviews contain spec diffs

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Not sure if we will need to follow the same process in the OP

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Nick: new agenda item to discuss the discrepancy of the Turtle files

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH):
https://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/index.html

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): TRS 3.0 draft link points to a broken spec

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): TRS 2.0 spec is not linked to

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): redirects were broken for quite a while

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we should consider always linking to the last reviewed spec in addition to the current WD

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we wanted to discourage people from browsing the archive

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jim suggests not to link to the Query 3.0

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): *2.0

Nick Crossley (IBM): To avoid large numbers of broken links and bookmarks, I believe open-services.net/wiki should redirect to archive.open-services.net/wiki

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): one way is to grey out the outdated specs with the red warning

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): another way is only to link to the new versions and in the spec link back

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH):
https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/blob/master/content/specifications/_index.md

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): There is a number of IBM employees that regularly check the old wikis. Redirects should work properly.

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jad: If the old pages are used frequently, we should lift them up to the new website.

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jim: we need to check if the RDF files have diverged from the ones approved by the committee.

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Link to the RDF files:
https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/tree/master/content/ns

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH):
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-domains/tree/master/open-services-vocabs

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): RDF files should be scripted from hugo

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): There are two scripts for that: one in the reSpec fork and the XSLT transform script.

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): the list is missing tools

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Links will need to be updated after the OP migration

Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): OP migration will also break the links in the spec

--

Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member

ELM Quality Manager

919-525-6575