Technical Comments on Resource Shape Document

I have reviewed the document and have some comments:  1. The document looks like valid RDF, but it contains resources that  correspond to multiple resources. The document base is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/  and the shape for  ManagedItem is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/ManagedItem . Similarly,  the shape for ManagedItemCollection is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/ManagedItemCollection .  This are two different information resources so they should be in  different documents. To make these dereferencable (like the vocabulary)  we'll have to decide on where to host them, e.g. the wiki, the document  db, etc. That will determine the URL we can use.  2. There are errors involving Value-type and Range. Value-type corresponds  to the property oslc:valueType which should only be used for datatype  properties, i.e. properties that have literal values. Range corresponds to  the property oslc:range which should only be used for object properties,  i.e. properties whose value is a URI.  3. There are typos, e.g. in ManagedItemCollection oslc_promcode:belongsTo  has Value-type xsd:dateTime and unspecified Range. It should have  unspecified Value-type and Range oslc_promcode:Project.  4. The Read-only and Rep. columns are always unspecified, so let's drop  them from the tables.  I think it would be useful to go through the resource shape during the  telecon and correct the errors.  Regards,  ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman, PhD  Chief Data Officer, Rational Chief Architect, Portfolio & Strategy Management Distinguished Engineer
Master Inventor
Academy of Technology  Toronto Lab
+1-905-413-3077 (office)
+1-416-939-5063 (mobile)