Resending: A summary of public review comments from the public review of PROMCODE CS02 as COS

I am resending this due to some character corruption in the previous mail.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROMCODE TC members,

The public review of PROMCODE specification CS02 was conducted from November 30, 2021 to January 29, 2022. Here is a summary. of comments

First, no external comments were received during the review period.

TC members did one more review of the specification document and posted their comments to the TC mailing list. Here is a list of links to the posting.

1. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202201/msg00007.html 

2. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202201/msg00003.html 

3. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202201/msg00000.html 

4. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202112/msg00010.html 

5.https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202201/msg00010.html 

6. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202112/msg00005.html 

In addition to these comments, Andrew Berezovskyi pointed out the inconsistency of document stages between promcode-spec.html and promcode-shapes.ttl.

7. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-promcode/202201/msg00006.html 

All the comments received are of editorial nature and do not affect the specification including the basic model and resource definitions. Here are brief description of each.

1. The comments are to update the editors' affiliation and e- mail address and adding acknowledge statements to Prof. Aoyama as well as to Nanzan University.

2. The comment is to add Kobayashi-san of NEC to the list of TC members in Appendix B.

3. Miss spells and typos in promcode-shapes.html

4. Grammatical error and typos in Chapters 5 and 7 of promcode-spec.html

5  Editorial comments on formatting and some wording in Chapter 4 of promcode-spec.html . Also a comment on reference to project management standard PMBOK. The current reference is to Edition 5 which is outdated and subsumed by the latest Edition 7. So, the reference needs to be updated.  

6. Editorial comments on miss spells and misplaced sentences in promcode-vocab.html

7. Inconsistency of stages between promode-spec.html and promcode-shapes.ttl. Both should be CS02. The same for promcode-vocab.html and promcode-vocab.ttl

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will revise the committee specification documents to accommodate all the comments. We will decide next actions at our next TC meeting on February 7, 2022.

T. Kamimura