Not at this point.
The document has been submitted.
On 8/21/2013 1:46 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, StJohns, Michael <> wrote: There is no ambiguity in what I wrote.
With context is indicated with a non-null pointer.
Without context is indicated by a null context pointer and a length of zero.
A context with a length of zero is indicated by a non-null pointer and a length of zero.
Yes, this will support both "no context" and a context with a length of 0.
Can you add this clarification (the last sentence "A context with a length of zero is indicated by a non-null pointer and a length of zero.") to the specification?
Thanks.
Wan-Teh Chang
