RE: [pkcs11] Groups - GMAC corrections and enhancements uploaded

David and all TC members,

 

While reviewing the GMAC proposal I noticed that table 60 allows CKM_AES_GMAC not only for functions “Sign & Verify” but also for function
 “Derive”. Does that make sense? CKM_AES_MAC, CKM_AES_CMAC and CKM_SHAnnn_HMAC are also not foreseen for key derivation. I suggest to remove the “√”
 symbol for the Derive function.

 

Thanks,

Dieter

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of David Gascon

Sent: Freitag, 21. April 2017 17:10

To: 

Subject: [pkcs11] Groups - GMAC corrections and enhancements uploaded

 

Document Name:
GMAC corrections and enhancements

Description

This document contains corrections for GCM/GMAC:

- Changed ulIvLen from 1- 256 bytes to 1 - 16

- Changed references in the GMAC section of HMAC to GMAC

- Added CK_GMAC_PARAMS to allow users to specify IV and tag length

- Moved GMAC section to below GCM and CCM encryption sections 

Download Latest
 Revision

Public Download Link

Submitter: Mr. David Gascon

Group: OASIS PKCS 11 TC

Folder: Documents

Date submitted: 2017-04-21 08:09:23

 

Utimaco IS GmbH

Germanusstr. 4, D.52080 Aachen, Germany, Tel: +49-241-1696-0, www.utimaco.com

Seat: Aachen – Registergericht Aachen HRB 18922

VAT ID No.: DE 815 496 496

Managementboard: Malte Pollmann (Chairman) CEO, Dr. Frank J. Nellissen CFO

This communication is confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at https://www.utimaco.com/en/e-mail-disclaimer/