Re: [pki-tc] PKI/e-business IETF draft co-editor

From
David Sweigert <>
Date
2003-02-27T21:01:10+00:00
ID
003e01c2dea3$3fa504d0$
Thread
Re: [pki-tc] PKI/e-business IETF draft co-editor
The lack of commercial usage of digital signature 
technology is about to change.

 

David Sweigert, CISSP

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Anders Rundgren 

  
To:  
  

  
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:17 
  PM

  
Subject: Re: [pki-tc] PKI/e-business IETF 
  draft co-editor

  

  

  
David,

  
If you take a look on the link I 
  supplied
( http://www.x-obi.com/OBI400/draft-rundgren-pkix-pnppki4ws-00.pdf )

  
it should give some indications of one area that 
  I feel does not work to well.

  
 

  
A powerpoint is also available:

  
http://www.x-obi.com/OBI400/PnPPKI4WS.ppt

  
 

  
I.e. it is really Web Services that are addressed 
  as this is what most people believe is where both PKI and e-business will be 
  in a relatively short period.  Below is an extract from another posting 
  highlighting some basic problems that the work is supposed to 
  address:

  
 

  
First it is important to note that digital 
  signatures are virtually non-existent in B2B so what follows here is 
  "theory".   Digital signatures have a major problem which did not 
  exist in the paper-world.  A signature on paper is a 
  technically imprecise way of giving "authenticy" to a 
  document.  A digital signature on the other hand identifies the 
  signer in a technically very strong way.  Now, lets say that 
  you have an invoice from ACME Corp (using any of the rather arbitrary ways to 
  identify this), what is the stronger part of the identity (i.e. the 
  certificate) supposed to contain?  And even worse, if you use personal 
  signatures what should these contain?  John Doe at ACME Corp?  Are 
  business systems supposed to cross-check between the claimed identity in the 
  business document and the certificate?  I believe so, but here there is 
  mostly zero interoperability and hardly any normative documents to find. 
  Consortiums like ebXML don't  touch such issues and PKI folks typically 
  shun business systems like the plague.  In case anybody of this list is 
  interested in this area (maybe even co-authoring), I'm currently toiling with 
  an IETF draft (enclosed), trying to "marry" PKI and business systems.  It 
  is worth noting that the e-Government in Sweden have (in their actual 
  systems), not yet addressed the idea that a citizen of an other 
  EU-country would use their certificate, which by the way is rather hard as 
  there is no universal way to express personal identities either.  The 
  qualified certificate standard does not require globally unique identities so 
  you could even end-up with name conflicts!  PKI is unfortunately an 
  immature technology originally designed for sending e-mail between individuals 
  which is rather different to sending messages between or to "machines" as the 
  latter only "compute" which is not equivalent to humans' 
  "understand".

  
 

  
Best

  
Anders R

  
 

  
----- Original Message ----- 
  

  

  
From: "David Sweigert" <>

  
To: "Anders Rundgren" <>; 
  <>

  
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 
  17:08

  
Subject: Re: [pki-tc] PKI/e-business IETF draft 
  co-editor

  

A short note:

It sounds like you 
  are seeking standards on the process of web-access
control
an 
  dauthentication.  Can you please define "e-Business" systems in a 
  more
clear manner ?

David Sweigert, CISSP

----- Original 
  Message -----
From: "Anders Rundgren" <>
To: 
  <>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: [pki-tc] 
  PKI/e-business IETF draft co-editor

> Dear List 
  members,
>
> PKI/e-business IETF draft co-editor
> 
  -----------------------------------------
> I am trying to find somebody 
  else who have also worked with combining
> e-business systems with 
  PKI.  This is currently an unusual combination in
> spite of all 
  that we have heard about the value of digital signatures.
Due to
> 
  this fact, there is an immanent need for addressing this, and in my
opinion 
  also
> a need to create one or more Internet Drafts.   
  However, in applicable
standard-
> groups like IETF's PKI Working 
  Group, PKIX, there is to my knowledge
hardly
> any persons with 
  suitable backgrounds for such a task.   Therefore I 
  am
looking
> in other places for a co-editor, or at least somebody to 
  try new ideas on
:-).
>
> 
  ===========================================================
> In case 
  you or somebody you know of, could be suitable, please contact 
  me
ASAP!
> 
  ===========================================================
>
> 
  These are the approximative "requirements":
>
> - Knowledge of 
  business systems architectures and technologies
>   like Web, 
  SQL and XML
>
> - Basic knowledge of PKI
>
> - An 
  genuine interest in user- and deployment-related questions
>
> - 
  Basic capability of reading technical standards documents
>
> 
  Note: This effort is mostly technical but if there is somebody out
> 
  there with an interest in CA business models and liability, this
> is 
  also of interest!
>
> This is an initial effort to study:
> 
  http://www.x-obi.com/OBI400/draft-rundgren-pkix-pnppki4ws-00.pdf
>
> Unfortunately you don't get paid by IETF, the 
  best you can hope for
> is that a draft is approved...
>
> 
  In case the OASIS PKI-TC is interested, this could be turned into
> an 
  OASIS effort.
>
> Best Regards
> Anders Rundgren
> 
  Senior Internet e-Commerce Architect
> +46 70 - 627 74 
  37
>
>