← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Raising a Web Sign std. in the PKI-TC

From
Anders Rundgren <>
Date
2005-10-13T04:58:10+00:00
ID
004d01c5cfb2$f6e52d70$8217a8c0@arport2v
Thread
Raising a Web Sign std. in the PKI-TC
Dear List.

 

A few months ago I asked the PKI-TC chairs if they 
were interested in the development of Web Sign standards.  They indicated 
that they were interested in this.

 

For those who are not familiar with Web Signing, my 
definition is simply: A user with a web browser that signs a form 
(transaction) when connected to an on-line service of some kind.  Although 
little used in the US, these schemes have become very popular in the EU due to 
the fact that secure e-mail has proved to be close to useless with respect to 
encryption[*], as well as being static and non-interactive (did I hear 
"boring"?).

 

The question for me is in which way the PKI-TC 
could contribute to such developments.  There are BTW two radically 
different proposals.

 

Anders Rundgren's: A "compilation" of a number 
of schemes already in use by millions of people

 

Arshad Noor's: An effort to bring XML security and 
end-to-end security to web, similar to S/MIME, but considerably more 
ambitious

 

Anyway, before going further on this road, I would 
like to take the opportunity to describe what I feel could work.  I do not 
regard the PKI-TC as a design TC, but rather a lobbyist type of 
community.  Due to that, it seems that the most constructive 
thing the PKI-TC could do, is to use its influence on various players in this 
space.

 

If we OTOH believe that the PKI-TC has a design 
capacity as well, I strongly recommend creating a separate group and list for 
this purpose. To create a design group (requirement spec. to begin with maybe?) 
though requires that there are some designers out there who are 
willing to take on such a task. 

 

Comments?

 

thanx

Anders Rundgren

 

*] "how do I send an 
encrypted message to the tax department" is a simple question that does not seem 
to have a reasonable answer in existing government PKIs.  Using the 
Web and HTTPS, mutual encryption comes at no cost.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →