I could copy some bullets from the "List of Deliverables" on the
Charter page of the PKI-TC, if there is consensus on it.
I concur that "gateway PKI" is important, but I think we need to
come up with a better term for this. Since we all understand that
digital certificates are being used in the application/back-end
servers, would "PKI-enabled Middleware Security" be better than
"gateway PKI"?
Arshad Noor
StrongAuth, Inc.
Anders Rundgren wrote:
> Some comments:
>
> Slide 1:
>
> - Technical interoperability
> - Enabling business applications
>
> What is the "action" part of this?
> Are the guidelines stuff out?
>
> Slide 2:
>
> - Future of PKI
>
> All examples listed where focused on client PKI.
>
> I'm convinced that gateway level PKI will prove to be at least as
> important, since it can nicely complement client-side PKI for
> numerous applications and e-business is absolutely one of them.
> VISA's 3D Secure (VbV) is based on this concept.
>
> Anders Rundgren
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arshad Noor" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 00:43
> Subject: [pki-tc] 3 slides for OASIS forum
>
>
> All,
>
> As promised in last week's session, here are 3 slides that I've come up
> with as a first-cut of what I intend to present in the 3 minutes that I
> will have in the OASIS forum on May 9th.
>
> Please review and provide comments. If you believe there should be more
> bullets/sub-bullets, please forward suggesttions to me before April 29.
> Thank you.
>
> Arshad Noor
> StrongAuth, Inc.
>
> P.S. I will use the OASIS format after the content is finalized.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php