← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

The fall of Gateway PKI Was:[pki-tc] 3 slides for OASIS forum

From
Anders Rundgren <>
Date
2006-04-24T19:50:13+00:00
ID
006201c667d8$bddb2390$82c5a8c0@arport2v
Thread
The fall of Gateway PKI Was:[pki-tc] 3 slides for OASIS forum
>Anders may be right that 
gateway PKI is important too, but it is not in the
>same league (with 
respect to numbers) as embedded client side PKI.

Servers would 
then be less interesting than End-user computers, as the latter outnumber the 
former by magnitudes.  In analogy with computers, client and gateway 
(server) PKI have different missions.

 >The outright need for gateway PKI 
will likely fall as embedded certificates become seamlessly easy to 
use.

 

Your term Embedded PKI applies very nicely to EMV 
since it for normal usage is simply a "card".

 

However, Embedded PKI is no panacea in the 
enterprise world as you unfortunately have to deal explicitly with handling 
certificates (particularly for encryption).

There is major difference between creating a global trust 
infrastructure for a single purpose, end-user activity, by a company like VISA, 
and establishing something similar in the unregulated enterprise space 
unless you expect end-users to manage 100-10000 partner trust anchors on 
their own (one for each organization they deal with).

 

Gateway PKI addresses these issues, and also removes the need for end-users 
to enforce company security policies because it will be done for them 
automatically (and transparently).

 

Anders Rundgren

 

Signing Purchase Orders

 

If the user is supposed to be accountable both with 
respect to his/her organization as well as with respect to the external 
supplier, something "interesting" happens: The user will have two sign 
TWICE.  Why is that?  Well, since "cost center" etc. is information 
that is vital for the internal accounting, but absent (secret actually) from 
external PO messages, there are indeed two messages[1] to sign for each purchase 
order.  What does this mean in practice?  It is just one more of a 
handful of other[2] really hard facts, that essentially says the same 
thing: E2ES (End-To-End-Security) in an org-to-org context, is essentially 
useless for all but e-mail.

 

There is nothing that can "bridge" [:-)] this deficit, 
and if there is, it has been thoroughly hidden.

 

AR

 

1] Here assuming that the PKI world will not be able to 
"reformat" the e-purchasing world (includes OASIS/UN with ebXML), in 
order to solve a problem ("GW security is heresy and must be fought at any 
cost and inconvenience"), the latter is completely unaware 
of.

 

2] 

  

  
Encryption of POs is hard to combine with internal 
  systems' legitimate needs.

  

  
Variant identities (users rather than trading 
  partners) are hard to cope with for automated supplier 
  systems.

  

  
Establishing a large org-to-org trust infrastructure 
  based on employees has so far failed.

  

  
Order numbers are usually assigned by the business 
  system after user submission, breaking 
  user signatures.

  

  
Privacy concerns make employee identities unsuitable 
  for business messages to suppliers or limit usage.

  

  
Employee signed POs may bypass the internal business 
  processes and the external supplier will not notice this.  Existing 
  systems does not have (by E2ES introduced), security 
  hole.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Wilson" <>
To: 
"Arshad Noor" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 01:04
Subject: [pki-tc] 
re:[pki-tc] 3 slides for OASIS forum

Thanks for that 
Arshad.  It's a tough gig doing PKI in three slides! 

My only 
comment would that I think we should elevate embedded PKI in the
future 
slide, perhaps to top position.  In my view, client side PKI is
likely 
to become ubiquitous in devices like smartcards and cell phones.  

[My favorite comparison is with magnetic stripe card technology.  
That is
so ubiquitous that we blissfully forget about the complexity 
of
ferromagnetics, and the complex supply chain that delivers card 
products
via blank plastics, magnetic tapes and bulk ferrite powders.  
Chip cards
will supersede all this in coming years, and digital certificates 
will
become at least as common as cards.]

A missing example on slide 3 
may be the EMV smartcard, which has embedded
client side PKI, with over 400 
million smart credit/debit cards already
issued.  

Anders may be 
right that gateway PKI is important too, but it is not in the
same league 
(with respect to numbers) as embedded client side PKI.  The
outright 
need for gateway PKI will likely fall as embedded certificates
become 
seamlessly easy to use.  

Cheers, 

Steve.

> 
All,
> 
> As promised in last week's session, here are 3 slides that 
I've come up
> with as a first-cut of what I intend to present in the 3 
minutes that I
> will have in the OASIS forum on May 9th.
> 
> 
Please review and provide comments.  If you believe there should be 
more
> bullets/sub-bullets, please forward suggesttions to me before April 
29.
> Thank you.
> 
> Arshad Noor
> StrongAuth, 
Inc.
> 
> P.S. I will use the OASIS format after the content is 
finalized.
> [attachment][attachment]

--
<Put email footer 
here>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →