RE: [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

Title: Discussion of 2 Functional Points

Thanks for the updated version, 
Mark.

 

To all - I will do the 
following to bring us up to date with this version:

 

(1) Review the changes 
and send out a summary for the team

 

(2) Make any necessary updates to 
the Discovery/Submission Functional Points document and 
resend

 

(3) I will do the 
same for the Metadata Functional Points document

 

I plan to have these 
completed by mid to end of week.

 

Kathryn, thanks for your 
hard work on the Metadata Functional Points document - it turned out really 
well!

 

Joe

 

************************************************************************** 

  Joseph M. Chiusano 
  Logistics Management Institute 
  2000 Corporate Ridge 
  
McLean, VA 22102 
  Email: 
 
  Tel: 571.633.7722 

************************************************************************** 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: CRAWFORD, Mark 
  
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:47 PM
To: CHIUSANO, 
  Joseph; ''
Subject: RE: 
  [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

  
To 
  all,

  
 

  
Attached is a copy of 
  the latest version of the core components TS.  This version will be 
  distributed by UN/CEFACT this week for a 30 day worldwide public comment 
  period.  There are some changes from version 1.75, including some to the 
  storage section.  

  
 

  
Mark 
-----Original Message-----
From: CHIUSANO, Joseph 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:42 
  PM
To: ''
Subject: 
  [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

  
    
Hi All, 

    
I'd like to kick off a 
    discussion of some of the registry-related functionality that is defined in 
    the Core Components spec v1.75, to elicit ideas about how the functionality 
    can be accomodated in our Registry architecture.  In the 
    Discovery/Submission Functional Points mapping document, we have the 
    following 2 functional points:

    
(1) The following relates to a 
    search for a business process within the Registry:  

    
"If an existing business 
    process is located that will be used, the new use should be identified to 
    the registry" 

    
(2) In the following, the user 
    has already found a suitable business process, and has identified the 
    relevant context categories of the business process:

    
"The registry will provide a 
    list of pre-defined Business Information Entities that are available to the 
    selected business process, and which meet the context criteria 
    specified"

    
I'd like to get your feedback 
    on the following: 

    
For (1):  How can the "new use" be identified to 
    the Registry? 

    
For (2):  How can we associated business 
    processes with BIE's in the Registry? 

    
I welcome all ideas, big or 
    small. 

    
Thanks, 
Joe 

    
************************************************************************** 
    
  Joseph M. 
    Chiusano 
  
    Logistics Management Institute 
  2000 Corporate Ridge 
  McLean, VA 22102 
    
  Email: 
     
  Tel: 571.633.7722 
**************************************************************************