Re: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XML Serialization)

From
Nikola <>
Date
2003-06-06T14:31:24+00:00
ID
013401c32c3a$3e548e40$190d1818@kubura
Thread
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XML Serialization)
<Joe prev>
...
where we attempt to map the CCTS Section 7 attributes to the existing RIM,
and use the RIM extensibility mechanism (slots) to accomodate those
attributes that could not be cleanly mapped.
...
</Joe prev>

<Joe>
<Quote1>
I think it is early to define what RIM artifacts we would use -> I can see
that we might use not only Slots, but other things like
ClassificationSchemes, ObjectTypes, Associations, ... that's why I think
that discovering and applying "Mapping Patterns" is important.
</Quote1>

I don't think it is too early to define this at all - I say let's keep the
ideas flowing, even
...
</Joe>

Just to clarify: I wanted to make it clear that I am not sure that "Slots
Only" approach is the one we should assume at this stage. And how we
discover "Mapping Patterns", sequentially / adhoc / ... is not that
important assuming we discover enough of them (and the right ones) to do the
job.

Nikola